Nuclear u-235 and u-238 isotope half life question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the U-235/U-238 isotopic ratio from 2 billion years ago, when the Oklo natural reactor was active. The current isotopic ratio is 0.00723, with U-238 having a half-life of 4.51 billion years and U-235 a half-life of 713 million years. The decay constants for U-235 and U-238 were calculated as 9.72 x 10^-10 and 1.54 x 10^-10 per year, respectively. A suggestion was made to divide the activity equations for both isotopes to find the ratio over time, leading to a calculated ratio of 0.1947, which the user doubts is correct. Further clarification and tips on radioactive decay calculations were requested to confirm the accuracy of the results.
debwaldy
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The present day value of the uranium isotopic ratio U-235/U-238 is 0.00723. The half life of U-238 is 4.51 x 10^9 and the half life of U-235 is 7.13 x 10^8 years. What was the U-235/U-238 isotopic ratio 2 billion years ago when the Oklo natural reactor was active?

Homework Equations


T1/2 = ln (2) / λ
τ = 1/λ
N(t) = No e^(-kt)


The Attempt at a Solution




Calculated the decay constant lambda for each isotope:

U-235: λ = 9.72 x 10^-10 per year

U-238: λ = 1.54 x 10^-10 years,

I'm not sure how to proceed or what I need to do next

New to this radioactive decay stuff so any tips or suggestions would be much appreciated.

Thanks,
Debbie
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have 2 equations, one for the activity of U-235 and one for the activity of U-238, each as a function of time. What happens when you divide one by the other?
 
As in the equation N(t) equations? will the No be different in each case?
 
If i do this and substitute in t = 2 billion years i get a ratio of 0.1947, although I don't think that this is correct?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top