Nuclear waste - is it possible to use it all via fast reactors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jarob22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for using nuclear waste as fuel in fast reactors. It highlights that while fission products are not typically used as fuel, unused uranium and transuranics from spent fuel can be repurposed. The disposal of spent fuel in the U.S. remains undecided, with options including direct disposal, reprocessing, or vitrification. Some fission products could have industrial applications, but separating them from radioactive materials is costly and complex. Overall, the feasibility of utilizing a significant percentage of nuclear waste remains challenging due to safety and economic factors.
Jarob22
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, first poster here :$

I'm doing a case study on nuclear waste and was wondering whether it's possible to use all (or a large percentage of) the dangerous nuclear waste we currently dump, as fuel in fast reactors? Sorry if it's a stupid question to you but I don't know all that much about nuclear power :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Jarob22 said:
Hi, first poster here :$

I'm doing a case study on nuclear waste and was wondering whether it's possible to use all (or a large percentage of) the dangerous nuclear waste we currently dump, as fuel in fast reactors? Sorry if it's a stupid question to you but I don't know all that much about nuclear power :)
The actual waste - fission products - are not used as fuel, or are they useful as fuel. Much of the spent (used) fuel consists of unused uranium (U-235 or U-238) or transuranics (TU), e.g., isotopes of Pu, Am, Cm. Those elements have been proposed for use as fuel in fast reactors.

In most commercial light water reactors, about 5% of the fuel is used. The remaining fuel is unused while some (few %) is converted to TU isotopes.
 
I see - I'm just reading that these fission products can be used for other industrial and medical uses (though it doesn't cite what these uses are) - is it at all possible to use up a large %age of these fission products in other procsses? Or will we have to bury most of the fission waste?
 
Jarob22 said:
I see - I'm just reading that these fission products can be used for other industrial and medical uses (though it doesn't cite what these uses are) - is it at all possible to use up a large %age of these fission products in other procsses? Or will we have to bury most of the fission waste?
In the US, the eventual disposal of spent (used) fuel has not been determined. Some want to place spent fuel in a respository, direct disposal, while others wish to reprocess (recover) the unused fuel and TU component. The rest of the spent fuel, i.e., fission products would be vitrified into a stable form and deposited into a repository.

Still others proposed to use accelerator driven systems to transmute spent fuel to shorter-lived nuclides prior to final disposal.

Some of the fission products (those which are not radioactive) would be useful for industrial purposes, but the problem is that they would have to be separated chemically from their radioactive relatives and other fission products.
 
Astronuc said:
Some of the fission products (those which are not radioactive) would be useful for industrial purposes, but the problem is that they would have to be separated chemically from their radioactive relatives and other fission products.

And I guess that's very expensive, right?
 
Jarob22 said:
And I guess that's very expensive, right?
It's energy intensive and must be done remotely. That = expensive.

Laser isotopic separation helps reduce the cost somewhat.
 
Ah right. Thanks for your help :)
 
Jarob22 said:
And I guess that's very expensive, right?

After U and Pu is separated, remaining stuff (fission products and some TUs) is emitting *millions* R/h. Any operations with it are hard. For example, chemical extraction of a non-radioactive element from it needs to be done several times: after first stage impurities make result "a bit" radioactive - "only" thousands R/h. You can easily calculate how many times one needs to repeat the process to arrive at acceptable level of activity (some micro-R/h).
 
Back
Top