Number of atoms in FCC gold cube with only the radius given

nour halawani
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
number of atoms in FCC gold cube with only the radius given!

1)it is given that the radius of a gold atom sphere is 144.2 pm, gold is packed in an FCC manner

Give the ratio Ns/Nv as a function of L (gold cube side) and a parameter

of FCC latice, knowing that Ns is the number of surface atoms and Nv is the number of atoms per volume.
2) and 3)
what i am thinking is:
in a unit cell we have 1/8 x 8 corner atoms = 1 atom and in the center of each phase we have 1/2 x 6 = 3 then the total number of atoms will be 4
atoms per unit = 4
volume of the cube is L^3 and volume of the unit is a^3 so if we want to know how many units are there in this cube we can divide the volume of the cube over the volume of the unit cell and we will have L^3/a^3
and if we multiply them by 4 which is the number of atoms per unit we will have the number of atoms in a cubic volume Nv= 4L^3/a^3

now talking about the surface is the thing confusing me
counting the atoms in unit cell is it 2 coming from 4 corners shared by 4 cells which is 1/4 x 4 and 1 center atom and by this we will have 2 atoms or my thinking is not reasonable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


won't i have an answer :(
 


nour halawani said:
1)it is given that the radius of a gold atom sphere is 144.2 pm, gold is packed in an FCC manner

Give the ratio Ns/Nv as a function of L (gold cube side) and a parameter

of FCC latice, knowing that Ns is the number of surface atoms and Nv is the number of atoms per volume.
2) and 3)
what i am thinking is:
in a unit cell we have 1/8 x 8 corner atoms = 1 atom and in the center of each phase we have 1/2 x 6 = 3 then the total number of atoms will be 4
atoms per unit = 4
volume of the cube is L^3 and volume of the unit is a^3 so if we want to know how many units are there in this cube we can divide the volume of the cube over the volume of the unit cell and we will have L^3/a^3

Correct so far...

nour halawani said:
and if we multiply them by 4 which is the number of atoms per unit we will have the number of atoms in a cubic volume Nv= 4L^3/a^3

now talking about the surface is the thing confusing me
counting the atoms in unit cell is it 2 coming from 4 corners shared by 4 cells which is 1/4 x 4 and 1 center atom and by this we will have 2 atoms or my thinking is not reasonable?

You do it well, and it will work well for large number of cells, but it is worth to count the atoms more carefully.
The gold cube has a sheet of surface cells on each side, 6 altogether. So the number of the inner cells is (L/a-2)^3.

Try to draw a cube of a few units. The cube in the picture is of 8x8x8 units, with 6x6x6 inner cells.

On one surface sheet, there are (L/a-2)^2 inner squares, which share the atoms at the corners with 3 other squares, and have their own atoms in the middle.

You have 12 edges of the gold cube. From each edge, (L/a-2) units are inner ones. The units have two unshared atoms at the centre of the outer sides, and common atoms at the outer corners.
There are eight corner cells with unshared atoms on the outer sides and corner.

Count all surface atoms, and take care so you do not count any of them twice.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • gold.JPG
    gold.JPG
    13.8 KB · Views: 494
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top