Number of modes in incoming light

  • Thread starter Thread starter octol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Modes
octol
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

if I have incoming radiation from a blackbody source filtered to a bandwidth of 0.1 nm and centered at a wavelength of 500 nm, why is the number of modes in this light not equal to the density of photon states times the bandwidth?

I.e why isn't it
\text{number of modes} = g(\omega) * \delta \omega = \frac{\omega^2}{\pi^2 c^3} \delta \omega
where
\omega = \frac{2 \pi c}{500 nm}
and
\delta \omega = \frac{2 \pi c}{0.1 nm} ?

If anyone knows why I'd be very thankful for an explanation.Jon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're omitting the exp(\hbar \omega/kT ) - 1 factor in the denominator, which comes from the occupation fraction of a Bose gas, if you are interested in the number of occupied states and not just the number of available states.
 
Yes but I thought that adding that factor would give me the number of photons? And that the there are more than one photon for every mode (frequency). Or have I missunderstood the question? I thought that "mode" refers to the number of available frequency states?

I can't say I've fully grasped the difference between "state", "mode" etc yet
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top