Number of Particles: Ne vs O - Is it the Same?

AI Thread Summary
5 liters of Neon (Ne) and Oxygen (O) can contain the same number of gas particles when considering Avogadro's Law, which states equal volumes of gases at the same temperature and pressure contain equal numbers of particles. However, the discussion highlights a distinction between atomic particles and molecular particles, noting that Ne has 30 particles per atom while O has 24 particles per atom. If considering molecular oxygen (O2), the number of particles would effectively halve, complicating the comparison. The question's phrasing about "O" versus "O2" leads to confusion, as pure oxygen quickly forms O2. Ultimately, the interpretation of "particles" significantly impacts the answer.
scientifico
Messages
181
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Do 5 L of Ne contain the same number of particles contained in 5 L of O ?

2. The attempt at a solution
The book say yes but I know that 5 L of Neon are 4.5 g and 5 L of Oxygen are 7.15 g.
So dividing them for their molecular weight I obtain 0.22 u and 0.44 u that aren't tha same :(
Where do I wrong?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What kind of particles? If you are referring to atoms, then, according to Avogadro's Law yes, it is true. But, if you consider 20Ne as the most abundant isotope being consisted of 10 protons, 10 electrons and 10 neutrons, then there are 30 particles per atom of neon, while if you consider 16O as the most abundant isotope of oxygen, then there are 8 protons, 8 electrons and 8 neutrons per atom, i.e. 24 particles per atom. So, in this sense, neon would have more particles in the same volume.
 
O or O2?
 
if would be O2 it's right to me but it says O
 
I don't like nonsensical questions. If it contains just O, in a blink it will contain O2, and the number of "particles" goes down by half.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top