Obtaining mathematical model for the kinetic system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the mathematical model for a kinetic system involving multiple masses and springs, with input force f(t) and kinetic friction constants b1 and b2. The user is uncertain whether to include friction forces between certain masses in their equations and questions the dependency of x1 and x2 on the input force f(t). They have attempted to modify their equations to account for these factors but remain confused about the correct formulation, particularly regarding the effects of springs and friction on the system's dynamics. Clarification is sought on how to properly express the equations for x3 and the overall system. The conversation highlights the complexities of modeling interactions in a multi-body kinetic system.
ssulun
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See attachment.

f(t) is the input force and b1 and b2 are kinetic friction constants. There is no static friction.

Homework Equations



ƩF = m \ddot{x}
F_s=kx
F_f=b\dot{x}

Ff is the force from friction and Fs is the force from spring.

The Attempt at a Solution



m_1\ddot{x_1}=-b_1\dot{x_1}-k_1x_1-k_1x_2
m_2\ddot{x_2}=-b_2\dot{x_2}-k_1x_1-k_1x_2-k_2x_2
m_3\ddot{x_3}=f

I have two questions:

1) Should I include the friction between m1 and m3 and m2 and m3 in the equation for x3 and why?

2) When I imagine this system, I think that f(t) should definitely affect x1 and x2, but in my equations it doesn't. Where am I doing wrong?

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • system.jpg
    system.jpg
    58.5 KB · Views: 476
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me try, hope somebody will correct me.
Taking springs as massless.

m1a=k1x1+b1m1g
m2a=k2x2+b2m2g-k1x1
(m1+m2+m3)a=f(t)
 
b1 and b2 are kinetic friction constants, and k1 spring is squeezed from both x1 and x2 so I can change those parts, but your work gave me new ideas, thank you.
 
I have modified it as:

m_1\ddot{x_1}=-b_1\dot{x_1}-k_1x_1-k_1x_2
m_2\ddot{x_2}=-b_2\dot{x_2}-k_1x_1-k_1x_2-k_2x_2
(m_1+m_2+m_3)\ddot{x_3}=f

But still, x1 and x2 don't depend on f and that bothers me.
 
I should have written the effect of k1 in the equation 1 as k1(x1+x2), not k1x1.

Also, the k2 spring will pull m3 with k2x2 (to balance the forces on the k2 spring). So should I write the equation for x3 as:
m_3\ddot{x_3}=f-k_2x_2
or should I write an overall system with (m1+m2+m3) and include the unbalanced forces from b1 and b2?

I am very confused.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top