- #1

- 77

- 0

as

V is d.proportiona to Current.

plz advise...

- Thread starter waqarrashid33
- Start date

- #1

- 77

- 0

as

V is d.proportiona to Current.

plz advise...

- #2

Averagesupernova

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 3,694

- 671

- #3

- 77

- 0

If you have a link from where i can get information about this then please give it.

- #4

- 2,479

- 99

- #5

vk6kro

Science Advisor

- 4,081

- 40

In the above example, a 10 volt to 20 volt transformer has a 20 ohm load on the 20 volt side.

The 20 volts across a 20 ohm load produces a current of 1 amp. All according to Ohm's Law.

The primary of the transformer looks like a 5 ohm resistor to the power supply due to the impedance varying as the square of the turns ratio.

The 10 volt power supply delivers 2 amps into this 5 ohm load, again, according to Ohm's Law.

Notice that the power in equals the power out, since there are no losses.

20 volts times 1 amp = 20 watts. 10 volts times 2 amps = 20 watts.

- #6

- 340

- 0

So you say if there is no load on the 20 volt side, there will be no current on the 10 volt side. I have to disagree.There are no exceptions to Ohm's Law. If the resistance of something changes due to temperature, then Ohm's Law applies to the new resistance.

In the above example, a 10 volt to 20 volt transformer has a 20 ohm load on the 20 volt side.

The 20 volts across a 20 ohm load produces a current of 1 amp. All according to Ohm's Law.

The primary of the transformer looks like a 5 ohm resistor to the power supply due to the impedance varying as the square of the turns ratio.

The 10 volt power supply delivers 2 amps into this 5 ohm load, again, according to Ohm's Law.

- #7

Averagesupernova

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 3,694

- 671

Why do you disagree?So you say if there is no load on the 20 volt side, there will be no current on the 10 volt side. I have to disagree.

- #8

vk6kro

Science Advisor

- 4,081

- 40

This is an ideal transformer, so, no, there won't be any current in the primary.

- #9

- 2,479

- 99

As far as transformers are concerned the wires from which the turns are made can be considered as being Ohmic but the device,as a whole, is certainly not Ohmic.With an ideal transformer the power input=power output(Vp*Ip)=(Vs*Is)

Vp= primary volts

Ip= primary amps

Vs=secondary volts

Is= secondary amps

- #10

vk6kro

Science Advisor

- 4,081

- 40

Ohm's law states that the current through a conductor between two points is directly proportional to the potential difference or voltage across the two points, and inversely proportional to the resistance between them.

Nothing in there about the resistance staying constant. You can make up your own definition, but don't call it Ohm's Law.

It is very common in electronics for a small change in voltage to be producing a small change in current. Where this happens on a curve, (of V vs I ), will decide what the result is. But even for a small variation, Ohms Law still applies. In the extreme case, the resistance at a point is the slope of the tangent at that point.

With a transformer, Ohm's Law applies at each winding. In any circuit, you can't expect to relate voltages and currents that are not connected to each other.

Even with an imperfect real transformer, Ohm's Law still applies to the various losses and reactive currents inside the transformer.

- #11

- 2,479

- 99

"More specifically Ohm's law states that R in this relation is constant independant of the current"

Perhaps you should also read on further especially to the sections entitled "linear approximations" and "temperature effects"

- #12

vk6kro

Science Advisor

- 4,081

- 40

Of course, if the voltage and current are directly proportional, then the resistance could not have changed. If it does change, then the voltage and current are related according to the new resistance.

Further down, the author states:

However, in some diode applications, the AC signal applied to the device is small and it is possible to analyze the circuit in terms of the dynamic, small-signal, or incremental resistance, defined as the one over the slope of the V–I curve at the average value (DC operating point) of the voltage (that is, one over the derivative of current with respect to voltage). For sufficiently small signals, the dynamic resistance allows the Ohm's law small signal resistance to be calculated as approximately one over the slope of a line drawn tangentially to the V-I curve at the DC operating point.

So, you can get a large signal or DC voltage, but if you try to vary the current by changing the voltage over a small range, it may take a totally different ratio of voltage to current to do this.

This is still Ohm's Law and it shows the power and beauty of the Law that it can be adapted to situations that Mr Ohm could not have dreamt of.

If you read further down, regarding reactive components, you can see the application of Ohms Law to AC circuits where there may not even be any resistance.

- #13

- 2,479

- 99

I'm not sure about the point you are making with your first sentence above since I was referring to the definition that you yourself quoted and I pointed out that this omitted information that is relevant to this discussion.

I agree with your second sentence and I agree also that the law can be applied succesfully to other "situations".I am not disputing the power and flexibility of Ohms law so I have a feeling we are at cross purposes here.My main point is that many components do not obey Ohms law and those that do are defined as being "Ohmic conductors" whose resistance remains constant over a wide range of voltages and currents.Since resistivity usually does change with quantities like temperature(all be it often by very small amounts)then Ohmic conductors are useful approximations only.For many,if not most practical problems,any deviations from Ohmic behaviour can be considered as negligible.

I agree with your second sentence and I agree also that the law can be applied succesfully to other "situations".I am not disputing the power and flexibility of Ohms law so I have a feeling we are at cross purposes here.My main point is that many components do not obey Ohms law and those that do are defined as being "Ohmic conductors" whose resistance remains constant over a wide range of voltages and currents.Since resistivity usually does change with quantities like temperature(all be it often by very small amounts)then Ohmic conductors are useful approximations only.For many,if not most practical problems,any deviations from Ohmic behaviour can be considered as negligible.

Last edited:

- #14

vk6kro

Science Advisor

- 4,081

- 40

We often assume that large resistors dissipate heat sufficiently well that their resistance does not change much during the course of an experiment.

That does not mean that Ohms Law does not apply in other cases, although some Physics texts would have you believe otherwise.

The change in resistance of components has nothing to do with Ohm's Law.

Whatever the resistance is determines the current that will flow for a given voltage.

If the resistance changes, the calculation becomes different, but you still use Ohm's Law to do it.

And you can't claim Ohm's Law doesn't apply to transformers when it clearly does.

- #15

- 2,479

- 99

Ohms law can be displayed mathematically by V=IR but the equation,on its own,is not a full expression of the law.Your Wiki definition referred to a constant R,the hyperphysics site definition refers to Ohmic(constantV/I) conductors,the ancient text book I have just dug out and have in front of me states Ohms law as follows."Under constant physical conditions,the resistance V/I is a constant independent of V and I"(Nelkon and Parker A level physics 4th edition).Even my Concise Collins Dictionary refers to the resistance as being the "constant of proportionality"

V=IR is a powerful equation and the fact that you can use it is not in dispute here but consider the following question:

Given the dimensions of a particular piece of copper wire ,the pd(V) across that wire and the current(I) through the wire find: 1.The resistance (R) of the wire.

2.The resistivity(rho)of copper

3.Check your answer to question 2. by looking up the resistivity of copper in a data book.

A student may use the equation to find the answers to 1. and 2.and feel fairly confident about the answers but then get baffled when they use the data book.The book will refer to other conditions such as temperature coefficient of resistance.In other words there is not a single value for resistivity since this depends on other quantities such as temperature.The equation on its own yields a single value for resistivity only,it is useful equation but it is limited and to give a full description of his answer the student would have to refer to the temperature of the wire under the conditions of the experiment.This limitation applies to the equation only,not to the law which is more powerful than just the equation because when expressed in full it refers to "constant conditions"

As for the transformer,read again what I wrote in post 9

V=IR is a powerful equation and the fact that you can use it is not in dispute here but consider the following question:

Given the dimensions of a particular piece of copper wire ,the pd(V) across that wire and the current(I) through the wire find: 1.The resistance (R) of the wire.

2.The resistivity(rho)of copper

3.Check your answer to question 2. by looking up the resistivity of copper in a data book.

A student may use the equation to find the answers to 1. and 2.and feel fairly confident about the answers but then get baffled when they use the data book.The book will refer to other conditions such as temperature coefficient of resistance.In other words there is not a single value for resistivity since this depends on other quantities such as temperature.The equation on its own yields a single value for resistivity only,it is useful equation but it is limited and to give a full description of his answer the student would have to refer to the temperature of the wire under the conditions of the experiment.This limitation applies to the equation only,not to the law which is more powerful than just the equation because when expressed in full it refers to "constant conditions"

As for the transformer,read again what I wrote in post 9

Last edited:

- #16

- 340

- 0

There will be current with phase lagging 90 degrees (assuming sine wave AC). With DC there will be the current defined by the resistance of the wire, assuming there was enough time so the current in primary coil has settled.This is an ideal transformer, so, no, there won't be any current in the primary.

- #17

Averagesupernova

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 3,694

- 671

- #18

- 340

- 0

No current is equivalent to any constant current. Why there will be no current and not just any constant current?

- #19

Averagesupernova

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 3,694

- 671

Huh?