Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Ohm's Law derivation from Drude Model

  1. Jun 6, 2008 #1
    I'm having trouble understanding the derivation of Ohm's law from the drude model.

    So you start with a simple sum of forces:

    [tex] \Sigma F_x = - e \: E + F_{collision} = 0 [/tex] (my understanding is that there are only two forces in Drude's model: those from electron-ion collisions and applied external electric field forces)

    Now i'm confused about how [tex] F_{collision} [/tex] is defined. The text i'm reading states

    [tex] \bar F_{collision} = \frac{\Delta p_x}{\Delta t} \approx \frac{-mv}{\tau} [/tex] (there is a bar over the F, which i'm assuming means averaged)

    where tau is the relaxation time

    It seems like they did something like this:

    [tex]F=\frac{dp}{dt}=\frac{\Delta p}{\Delta t} =\frac{p}{t} =\frac{mv}{t} [/tex]

    This is the part i don't understand. how does [tex] \Delta p = p[/tex] ?

    Sure you can do that for say position:

    [tex] \frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t} = \frac{x}{t} [/tex]

    but you must assume that the initial position and time were at x=0 and t=0 respectively. For momentum, how can you assume that the initial momentum is 0?

    The derivation then continues with simple algebraic rearrangement.

    [tex] - e \: E + \frac{-mv}{\tau} = 0 \: \: \Rightarrow \: \: eE = \frac{-mv}{\tau} \: \: \Rightarrow \: \: v=\frac{-eE \tau}{m}[/tex] , where v is the drift velocity

    Thanks guys.
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 6, 2008 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The Drude model is not at all "exact" in any way; the whole idea is to model what happens "on average" for a single particle in the electron gas and use that to model properties of the bulk. Hence, the details of every single collision is irrelevant.

    [tex] \bar F_{collision} = \Delta p_x/\Delta t \approx \frac{-mv}{\tau} [/tex] is just a common way of modelling collisions in classical mechanics. In this case it is not meant to be an exact description of what is happening, it is merely a good approximation where [tex]\tau[/tex] is just essentially a free parameter with the dimension of time that has to be determined using experiments (i.e. [tex]\tau[/tex] does not neccesarily have anything to do with the time it takes for a single, real, collsion, and the latter would obviously need to be modelled using QM and can't be described using classical mechanics).

    [tex]\Delta p_x/\Delta t[/tex] is just a first order approximation to [tex]dp/dt[/tex] which would be exact if the momentum was changing in a linear fashion during the collision (this type of model is often introduced by considering a rubber ball hitting the floor). The reason why this works is because [tex]\Delta p[/tex] is NOT the total momentum but the CHANGE in momentum that takes place during the time [tex]\Delta t=\tau[/tex].
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2008
  4. Jun 6, 2008 #3
    The equality [tex]\Delta p = p[/tex] is, IIRC, made assuming that during a collision, the electron stops, or that any given electron might come out of a collision event in a random direction, so that the average p after a collision is 0.
  5. Jun 6, 2008 #4
    In reality, the scattering time is just a phenomenological fitting parameter. You know that the collision force is going to be some function of the velocity, and so you expand it in a Taylor series, F = a_0 + a_1*v + higher order terms. However, you know that F=0 when v=0, and so the zeroth-order term must vanish. If you then assume that the velocity is small, then you can neglect the higher order terms and just get a term that is linear in v.

    And, as others have noted, the Drude model is nowhere near exact. I can tell you from personal experience that more detailed models for carrier transport and scattering in solids are extremely important for a lot of solid state devices.
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2008
  6. Jun 6, 2008 #5

    Dr Transport

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Exactly, see this post......


    My advisor, a couple of his collaborators and I at one time may have been the experts in transport theory in crystalline systems, I believe I did the only work in exact transport in anisotropic (tetragonal) lattices.

    Drude is a reasonable 1st order estimate in cubic materials, you have to get into solving the Boltzmann Equation for really good estimates.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Ohm's Law derivation from Drude Model
  1. Drude model! (Replies: 5)

  2. Drude model (Replies: 3)