One dimensional motion problem =/

AI Thread Summary
Two trains traveling toward each other at 78 km/h and 135 km/h begin braking when they are 980 m apart, decelerating at 1.0 m/s². The initial calculations for the braking distance of the first train were incorrect, resulting in an unrealistic distance of 1213.28 m. Correcting the approach, the average speed during braking is identified as 11 m/s, leading to a more reasonable stopping distance of approximately 231 m. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper unit conversion and using the correct kinematic equations for accurate results. Ultimately, the clarification helps the user understand their mistake and reassess their calculations.
Double D Edd
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

Well, I am sort of stuck on this problem:

Two trains, one traveling at 78 km/h and the other at 135 km/h, are headed toward one another along a straight, level track. When they are 980 m apart, each engineer sees the other's train and applies the brakes. The brakes decelerate each train at the rate of 1.0 m/s^2.

(a) What is the braking distance for the first train?

(b) What is the braking distance for the second train?

(c) Do they both collide? Yes or No.

This is what I did:

For the first part, since the original distance between the trains wasn't 980m, I decided to draw a diagram where they both apply the breaks and with the lease distance between them as 980m. So, I kept the initial position as 980m and tried to figure out the final position (where the first train stops), then took the final velocity as zero. I then applied the [v(t) = at+ v initial] and found t = 21.6s after converting the speed of the first train to m/s. Then I plugged that into the second equation for constant acceleration and ended up with 1213.28m, which I think is ridiculous. What am I doing wrong here? Of course, I can find out the answers for two and three once I get the first part. Any help or hints appreciated.

Edd.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Double D Edd said:
I then applied the [v(t) = at+ v initial] and found t = 21.6s after converting the speed of the first train to m/s.
That's correct.

Double D Edd said:
Then I plugged that into the second equation for constant acceleration and ended up with 1213.28m, which I think is ridiculous.
1213.28m is way too much. What formula did you use? You should get something like 233m.
 
This kinematic equation might be very useful:

x = \frac{v_f^2 - v_i^2}{2a}
 
I used X(t) = 1/2*a*t^2 + initialV*t + initial position. I put 980 as the initial position. And thanks for clarifying my time part :) And how did you get 233m XD, because that really makes sense, and I am going to try and get that.
 
Last edited:
Edd: to get the feel for this sort of thing you need to look up conversion on google. Or do the math. To go from kilometres per hour to metres per seocnd you multiply by .277778. So the first train is going at 21.66 m/s and decelerating at 1m/s and we're cooking on gas. - it's going to take 21+ seconds to stop, during which time it's going 21 metres per second, then 20 metres per second, then 19 metres per second, etc. The average speed during the stopping period is 11 m/s, and it lasts for 21 seconds, so we' re talking about something like 231m to stop. This tells you whether your arithmetic is in the right ball park, and if it is, you can repeat for the other train, and: easy peasy, bob's your knob, sorted!
 
Ohhhh! XD Now I get it. And I think me taking 980m as the initial position was ridiculous.

Thanks a lot, everyone :D.

Edd.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top