One Dimensional Slab Heat Transfer Taylor Expansion in Glasstone

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Taylor series expansion in the context of heat flow in nuclear reactor engineering. A participant seeks clarification on the incremental form of the Taylor series and its derivation, particularly regarding the transition from (dt/dx)_(x+dx) to its simplified expression. The conversation explains how net heat flow is calculated by considering heat entering and exiting a differential control volume, leading to the formulation of the heat equation using Fourier's law. It emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between partial and total differentials in the derivation process. The thread concludes with a note on the Taylor series for the first derivative, reinforcing the mathematical foundation of the discussion.
terryphi
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Hi There,

I came across the following passage in Sam Glasstone's 'Nuclear Reactor Engineering'

WqhHDFw.png


See where I underlined in red that taylor series expansion? I don't understand how (dt/dx)_(x+dx) is equal to that.

I know it's a Taylor series expansion, but where did the x+dx go?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
 
Well,

I know it's the incremental form of the Taylor series:
http://geophysics.ou.edu/solid_earth/readings/taylor/taylor.html

But I have no clue how to derive this incremental form.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The differential is supposed to be small, so we can neglect higher order terms in the Taylor series expansion since squaring a small number will give you an even smaller number. So you have heat entering and exiting your differential control volume,

That is Net Heat Flow:

qx- qx+dx.

See the heat enters at position x and leaves at a position x + a very small amount (dx). Now if we do a Taylor series expansion

qx+dx= qx +(dqx/dx)*dx

Take this expression and substitute into the above expression for net heat flow.

qx-qx+dx=qx-qx+(dqx/dx)*dx

Then:
qx-qx+dx=(-dqx/dx)*dx

No you can't cancel those two dx terms because one is a partial differential and the other is total. The one in parentheses is the partial differential.

Now we can describe qx using Fourier's law

qx=-kA(dT/dx).

Substitute this into our above expression

-d/dx*(-k *dydz*dT/dx)*dx

Net heat flow in x direction is now

d/dx*(kdT/dx)*dxdydz

The area in the x direction is given by y times z, similarly in the y direction area will be given by x and z

If you do those equations for the y and z directions and then divide the whole equation by dxdydz you will obtain the heat equation.

I assume you were ok with the other terms in the heat equation. If not I'm happy to explain the derivation of those as well
 
terryphi,

I looks like a Taylor series expansion for the first derivative instead of the function itself.

The Taylor series expansion for function "f" about x = 0 is:

f(x) = f(0) + df/dx dx + 1/2 d2f/dx2 (dx)^2...

In this case, the function f is dT/dx; so all the derivative are one degree higher.

Greg
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top