One more question on Magnetic Fields

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the magnitude of the magnetic field acting on a current-carrying metal rod suspended by two wires at an angle theta. The forces involved include the weight of the rod and the magnetic force, which are balanced when the rod is in equilibrium. The angle theta is crucial as it influences the tension components in both vertical and horizontal directions. By applying trigonometric relationships and the equilibrium conditions, the magnetic field can be calculated using the formula B = mg / (ILcos(theta)). This approach effectively combines the forces to derive the necessary magnetic field strength.
andrew410
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
A metal rod having a mass per unit length p carries a current I. The rod hangs from two vertical wires in a uniform vertical magnetic field as shown in the figure below. The wires make an angle theta with the vertical when in equilibrium. Determine the magnitude of the magnetic field.

Figure: http://east.ilrn.com/books/sepsp06t/pse6e.29.64p.e.jpg

I'm not sure where I need to use the theta for in this problem. I know again that we need to apply the formula F=IL x B, but need help starting it.

Again any help is great! thx~! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this case there are two forces acting on the current carrying conductor, perpendicular to each other. Weight force (down), and magnetic force (left). The vector sum of these two forces points in the direction of the two supporting wires, diagonally down at an angle @ (theta) to the vertical axis. Using trigonometry (and perhaps a vector diagram to help you visualise):
tan@ = (magnetic force)/(weight)
= BIL/mg,

so you can find B. To determine the sign of B (positive or negative), you need to see if the diagram is consistent with the right hand rule.
 


Hi there,

In this problem, theta is the angle that the wires make with the vertical when the rod is in equilibrium. This angle is important because it affects the force that the magnetic field exerts on the rod. Let's break down the problem step by step:

1. First, let's draw a free body diagram of the rod. We have the weight of the rod acting downwards, and the tension in the wires acting upwards. The wires make an angle theta with the vertical, so we can break the tension force into its vertical and horizontal components.

2. Now, let's consider the forces acting on the rod in the horizontal direction. We have the horizontal component of the tension force, which we can label as Tcos(theta), and the magnetic force, which is given by F=IL x B. Since the rod is in equilibrium, these two forces must be equal and opposite.

3. Next, we can consider the forces acting on the rod in the vertical direction. We have the weight of the rod acting downwards, and the vertical component of the tension force, which we can label as Tsin(theta). Again, since the rod is in equilibrium, these two forces must be equal and opposite.

4. Now, we can combine these two equations to eliminate the tension force and solve for the magnetic field, B. We get:

Tcos(theta) = F = ILB
Tsin(theta) = mg

Solving for B, we get:

B = mg / ILcos(theta)

Therefore, the magnitude of the magnetic field is given by B = mg / ILcos(theta).

I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any further questions.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top