Open Circuit Voltage, Thevenin Equivalent

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the open circuit voltage across terminals A and B in a circuit. The initial attempt involved setting up equations based on current through resistors, leading to a potential difference calculation. However, an error was identified in the solution, particularly regarding the currents calculated, which suggested an impossible voltage across a resistor. It was recommended to compute the Thevenin equivalent of the circuit first for a clearer solution. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate calculations and the utility of Thevenin's theorem in circuit analysis.
hbweb500
Messages
40
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Find the open circuit voltage across A & B:

BJn6V.png




Homework Equations


V = IR


The Attempt at a Solution



If I0 is the current leaving the voltage source and passing through the first resistor, I1 is the current through the left resistor in parallel, and I2 through the two other resistors, then:

V - I_0 R - I_1 R = 0

-2 I_2 R + I_1 R = 0

I_0 = I_1 + I_2

Solving gives a current I_2 = \frac{2 V}{5R}, therefore the potential difference across the A & B terminals is \Delta V = I_2 R = \frac{2 V}{5}

The book says this is \frac{V}{5}.<br /> <br /> Am I doing something wrong, or have I found an error in the book?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You made an error while solving the equations. You can see this if you try to find all the currents: If I_2 = 2V/5R then I_1 is 4V/5R and I_0 wil be 6V/5R, but this means that the leftmost resistance has a potential difference of 1.2 V_0 across it, which is impossible.

This problem is easier to solve if you compute the thevenin equivalent of the circuit to the left of C and D first. It will also be useful when you have to compute the short circuit current of the entire circuit.
 
Yep, that's the case. I must have plugged it into Mathematica wrong.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top