Optical detector sensitivity at low and medium flux

AI Thread Summary
An optical detector may exhibit better sensitivity at medium flux levels compared to low flux due to the influence of readout noise. It is possible for a detector to distinguish between closely spaced medium flux levels, such as 100 mW and 100.1 mW, while failing to detect lower levels like 0.1 mW. Adding a background signal can help improve detection of low-level signals, but it must be managed carefully to avoid increasing overall noise. The discussion highlights that while a detector's response can improve with higher light levels, the noise remains constant, which can create misleading perceptions of sensitivity. Ultimately, the relationship between optical flux and detector sensitivity is complex, often influenced by the characteristics of the detector and the specific application.
Laloum Eric
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

This is my first post and I'm not sure if it's the right place to ask so don't hesitate to advise if necessary.
I would like to know if it's possible that an optical detector (the complete system including sensor and front-end electronics) has a better sensitivity at medium flux than at low flux near detector readout noise. Practically speaking is it possible to have a detector capable of discriminating 100 mW and 100.1 mW but not being able to detect 0.1 mW, notably because of readout noise. If it would be the case, then a solution to detect low level signal below the readout noise would be to add an offset background signal (of course not too high background in order that the background noise stays below detector readout noise).

Thank you.

Eric
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Imagine the amplifier connected to an oscilloscope. In the absence of a light signal, suppose we see 10mV of noise on the trace. Now turn on the weak light signal to be detected, and suppose we now see the noise trace raised by 10mV. If we add some "light bias", the trace will be raised up, say by 1 volt, but will still be thickened to the extent of 10mV by noise as before. So there is no advantage.
But if the detector, as a typical diode, has a square law characteristic, then adding light bias will raise the sensitivity of the detector by bringing the operation on to a steeper slope. Whether the signal/noise ratio is improved by so doing I am uncertain. I did see a TV camera (using mechanical scan) and utilising a solar cell as the pick up device, in which light bias was used to good effect.
Incidentally, if you use an oscilloscope (or spectrum analyser) displaying dB on the Y axis, then it gives the appearance that noise is reduced as the signal gets bigger, but this is just an artifact of the Decibel System, the noise actually remaining the same.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
Thank you for your detailed answer. I guess the square law relates to the fact that the output electrical power varies as the square of the input optical flux (output current is linear towards light flux). Still, I though that detector sensitivity is expressed as current vs light flux. So, can we really say that sensitivity slope is increasing with increased light flux
?
 
I think the diode current is usually proportional to optical power, so it is linear. I am not sure why my camera example used light bias - it was a very old type of solar cell.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
152
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
24
Views
5K
Back
Top