Optical Probe Clarity: Examining Power Loss vs. Beam Spot

AI Thread Summary
Using a signal power budget to assess laser probes offers a more quantitative analysis of performance compared to merely evaluating beam spot clarity. This method involves calculating power loss in dBm and dB, which can provide a clearer understanding of probe efficiency. The current practice of checking beam brightness may overlook critical data regarding signal integrity. Additionally, the discussion highlights the importance of considering laser safety, specifically noting that the lasers in use are classified as Class 3B. Overall, transitioning to a power budget approach may enhance the accuracy of vibration and data testing in the lab.
daniel1211
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
I work in a lab that uses laser probes to test for vibration and other data, currently the lab techs hook up the probe to a laser source and check to see how bright and clear the beam spot is. I have been working on having a signal power budget created for each probe using a laser source and detector and calculating the probes power loss in dBm and dB.

Am I wrong in believing this is a better option then just looking at the beam spot?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
daniel1211 said:
I work in a lab that uses laser probes to test for vibration and other data, currently the lab techs hook up the probe to a laser source and check to see how bright and clear the beam spot is. I have been working on having a signal power budget created for each probe using a laser source and detector and calculating the probes power loss in dBm and dB.

Am I wrong in believing this is a better option then just looking at the beam spot?
What is the safety class of the laser?
 
Class 3B
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top