Optics problem: electromagnetic theory

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the relationship between the electric field (E) and magnetic field (B) in electromagnetic waves, specifically showing that (dE/dx) = -(dB/dt) leads to Eo = cBo. Participants work through the differentiation of E and B, confirming that kEo = -wBo, which implies that the wave speed (c) is equal to w/k. Clarifications are provided regarding the signs in the equations and the application of the chain rule. The conversation emphasizes the connection between wave properties and their mathematical representation. Overall, the participants successfully clarify the relationship between the fields in the context of electromagnetic theory.
cuti_pie75
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
If anyone who's good at optics/physics can help me with this electromagnetic part of optics...it'll be great.

so here's the problem:

imagine an electromagnetic wave with it's E-field in the y-direction. Show that (dE/dx)=-(dB/dt) applied to the harmonic wave B

E=Eo cos(kx - wt) B=Bo cos(kx - wt)

yields to the fact that Eo=cBo
in agreement with Ey=cBz

thanx in advance :blushing:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi cuti_pie75.

Just work out (dE/dx)=-(dB/dt) with what you're given.
I`ll do dE/dx:

\frac{dE}{dx}=\frac{d}{dx} E_0 \cos(kx-\omega t) = -kE_o\sin(kx-\omega t)
Differentiate B with respect to t and use the equation (dE/dx)=-(dB/dt).

You also need that \vec E_0=E_y \hat y (this was given).
And assuming the direction of the wave is in the +x-direction. \vec B_0= B_z \hat z.
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much for your fast reply Galileo, everything's much more clearer to me now...but i just have one more question:

i did the derivative for B in respect to t and comes to: kEo = -wBo
so my question is -w/k = c?

anyway, sorry for the bother and thanks again!
 
Almost, remember the equation is (dE/dx)=-(dB/dt), so you have a minus sign. There is another minus sign coming from the derivative of the cosine and another one from the chain rule (derivative of (kx-wt) with respect to t is -w).
So you get kEo=wBo
w/k indeed equals the speed of the wave (c in this case).
the way I always remember it, is by knowing that a traveling wave always has the form f(x-vt) with v the speed of the wave. kx-wt=k(x-w/kt), so w/k is the speed,
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top