Optics & Snell's Law: Finding Distance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Snell's Law to determine the distance between a man holding a beam of light and a target underwater. The angle of incidence is 29.9 degrees, leading to a calculated angle of refraction of 21.95 degrees as the light enters the water. The man is positioned 1.48 meters above the water's surface, while the target is 3 meters below it. To find the distance between the man and the target, participants suggest using trigonometry to establish coordinates for both points based on the angles and distances involved. The conversation emphasizes the importance of diagramming the scenario to visualize the relationships between the angles and distances.
Anieves
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am having A LOT of trouble figuring this one out. . .Some please help.. ok here it goes- So there is a beam of light (with and angle of incidence of 29.9 degrees) and so using snell's law I calculated that the angle of refraction is 21.95 degrees (using n1 as air and n2 as water). The ray of light goes into the water and hits a target. How far is the target from the beam if the target is 3m underwater and the gun shooting the beam is 1.48m above the surface of the water? What equation is available if I need to find distance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anieves said:
How far is the target from the beam...
I assume this means "how far is the target from the line of the original beam". In other words, the apparent position of the object is along the line of the original in air beam, but the actual position is some distance away from that line due to refraction. Make sense?

To find this distance, draw a careful diagram and use some trig. Indicate the refracted beam, the extended original beam, and the location of the object.
 
description if diagram

Ok, so there is a beam coming down hitting the surface of the water and 29.9 degrees to the horizontal. (that's the theta i) The beam comes down into the water where it moves away from the normal because n2>n1. The angle of refraction that I found was 21.95(that's theta r). N1 is air=1 and N2 is water=1.333. The object is 3m below the water level and the man holding the beam is 1.48m above the surface level. How far is the object from the man holding the beam?
 
Anieves said:
Ok, so there is a beam coming down hitting the surface of the water and 29.9 degrees to the horizontal. (that's the theta i) The beam comes down into the water where it moves away from the normal because n2>n1.
The refracted beam moves towards the normal.
The angle of refraction that I found was 21.95(that's theta r). N1 is air=1 and N2 is water=1.333. The object is 3m below the water level and the man holding the beam is 1.48m above the surface level. How far is the object from the man holding the beam?
It looks like you've stated the problem a bit more clearly. (A different problem than what I assumed from your initial description in the first post.)

Find the coordinates of the man and the object and use them to find the distance between those two points. For example, the coordinates of the man (assume the light is going left to right, and use the point where the beam hits the water as the origin) would be y = +1.48m. The x coordinate can be found by examining the right triangle whose hypotenuse goes from the man to the origin; use trig to find the bottom leg of the triangle, which will be the x coordinate of the man. One angle in that triangle will be the angle of incidence.

Then do the same thing under the water with the object by find a right triangle with the hypotenuse going from object to origin. This way you'll find the x and y coordinates of the object.

(PS: (1) Post these kinds of questions in this forum, not general physics; (2) Don't start a second thread on the same topic.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top