Optimizing Resultant Forces: Finding Maximum and Minimum Magnitudes

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the maximum and minimum magnitudes of the resultant force from three horizontal forces of specified magnitudes and directions. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and conceptual clarification related to vector addition and equilibrium in mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the greatest magnitude occurs when all forces are aligned in the same direction, while the minimum occurs when two forces are in one direction and the third in the opposite direction, based on head-to-tail vector addition.
  • Another participant claims that a zero magnitude resultant vector can be achieved by arranging the forces to form a closed triangle, indicating that this arrangement is necessary for equilibrium.
  • A later reply proposes a specific configuration for achieving a zero resultant, detailing the directions of the forces and suggesting the use of inverse cosine to find angles, while noting that there are multiple solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to achieve the maximum and minimum resultant magnitudes, with some proposing specific arrangements while others challenge those ideas. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal configurations and their implications.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the arrangement of forces and the definitions of maximum and minimum magnitudes, as well as the conditions under which these configurations hold true.

Needhelp2
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Three horizontal forces of magnitudes 8N, 15N and 20N act at a point. The 8N and 15N are at right angles to each other. The force 20N makes an angle of 150 degrees with the the 8N force and an angle of 120 degrees with the 15N force.

State the greatest and least possible magnitudes of the resultant force if the directions of the three horizontal forces can be altered.

Any help would be greatly appreciated, the question had many parts, the last one ( the one above) threw me (Nerd)
Thank you!

sorry for the poor diagram!
 

Attachments

  • 2.png
    2.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 142
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I believe that the greatest magnitude will be when they all have the same direction and the minimum magnitude will be when two are in one direction and the third is in the opposite. This can be demonstrated visually by head to tail addition. I know this is true for two vectors and I don't see why it shouldn't apply to three.
 
Jameson said:
I believe that the greatest magnitude will be when they all have the same direction and the minimum magnitude will be when two are in one direction and the third is in the opposite. This can be demonstrated visually by head to tail addition. I know this is true for two vectors and I don't see why it shouldn't apply to three.

[EDIT] This post is completely wrong, as shown by Opalg's post below. Please disregard.

You can actually get a zero magnitude resultant vector in a fairly straightforward manner, at least in this problem. Solution: put the 20N force going straight left, and the 15N force going straight right. Then put the 8N force at an angle such that its x-component is +5. You can use the inverse cosine function to find out what angle that will be (there are actually two solutions, of course). Since you can't get a negative magnitude for the resultant vector, this will be the minimum.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 162
To get the forces in equilibrium (so that the resultant force has zero magnitude), arrange their directions so as to form a closed triangle, as in the diagram.
 

Attachments

  • forces.png
    forces.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 120
Thank you so much! It came up in my Mechanics mock, so the fact I couldn't do it worried me slightly... But the simple solution makes me feel a bit better :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K