Organic chemistry determing nucleophile strength

AI Thread Summary
Weak bases generally make good nucleophiles, but determining which bases are weak involves understanding their pKa values. A low pKa indicates a strong acid and thus a weak base, making it a better nucleophile. While basicity is a key factor, other considerations can influence nucleophilicity as well. Familiarity with common weak and strong bases can aid in this determination. Understanding pKa values is essential for identifying effective nucleophiles in organic chemistry.
physstudent1
Messages
267
Reaction score
1
this isn't exactly an specific question but a general one. I know that weak bases make good nucleophiles but how do I determine what bases are the weakest, what is weak enough to be considered a "good nucleophile" I'm a little confused please help thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physstudent1 said:
this isn't exactly an specific question but a general one. I know that weak bases make good nucleophiles but how do I determine what bases are the weakest, what is weak enough to be considered a "good nucleophile" I'm a little confused please help thanks a lot!


In general the more basic an agent is the more nucleophilic , however there are other factors to consider besides basicity. Your teacher is probably not going to get specific , just know the common bases that are considered weak or strong.
 
To determine base strength you need to look at the pKa value for the molecules conjugate acid (add an H+ to the molecule). If the conjugate acid has a low pKa (strong acid) then the original molecule is a weak base...and high pKa=strong base.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top