Organic Chemistry - Nomenclature Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around naming a specific organic molecule, with the user unsure about identifying the longest carbon chain. There is confusion about whether the molecule should be classified as nonane or octane. Participants suggest drawing alternative numbering schemes to clarify the longest chain. Ultimately, it is advised to select nonane as it represents the longest carbon chain. Accurate nomenclature is crucial in organic chemistry for proper identification of compounds.
soccer123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(see uploaded attachment for picture). I basically have to name this molecule.



The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know where to start counting for the longest carbon chain and I'm not sure if it's a nonane or octane.

If you guys can help it'd be much appreciated
 

Attachments

  • OChem Nomenclature.jpg
    OChem Nomenclature.jpg
    1.7 KB · Views: 533
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you draw out alternative numbering schemes such that it could be either a nonane or an octane?
 
If you have to selected between nonane and octane, you should select nonane, as its the longest chain, isn't it?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top