Oscillating Mass between Two Springs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the oscillation frequency of a block connected to two springs with constants k1 and k2. The key equation to prove is f = (f1² + f2²)^(0.5), where f1 and f2 are the frequencies for each spring individually. Participants suggest calculating the frequencies using the formula f = (1/2π)√(k/m) for each spring and for the combined system with k = k1 + k2. The relationship between the frequencies is clarified, emphasizing that the combined frequency can be derived from the individual frequencies using the Pythagorean theorem. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of a simpler approach to the problem.
kppc1407
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block on a frictionless table is connected to two springs having spring constants k1 and k2. Show that the block's oscillation frequency is given by f = (f12 + f22).5 where f1 and f2 are the frequencies at which it would oscillate if attached to spring 1 or spring 2 alone.

Homework Equations



f = 1/T
T = 2pi(m/k).5


The Attempt at a Solution



I have substituted the period into the frequency and I am stuck. It looks like they found f1 and f2 alone and put them into the Pythagorean theorem, but I do not know how to relate them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kppc1407 said:

Homework Statement



A block on a frictionless table is connected to two springs having spring constants k1 and k2. Show that the block's oscillation frequency is given by f = (f12 + f22).5 where f1 and f2 are the frequencies at which it would oscillate if attached to spring 1 or spring 2 alone.

Homework Equations



f = 1/T
T = 2pi(m/k).5


The Attempt at a Solution



I have substituted the period into the frequency and I am stuck. It looks like they found f1 and f2 alone and put them into the Pythagorean theorem, but I do not know how to relate them.
I do not see any relation to Pythagorean theorem. Notice that if you were to latch two springs onto a mass, you could model the same motion with one spring with a constant equal to the sum of the two springs. Knowing this, calculate the frequency of all three configurations(spring 1, spring 2, and spring 1 & 2 combined). Next, substitute your answer for spring 1 and spring 2 into that equation and see if you get the same answer you derived for spring 1 & 2 combined.
 
When I find the frequencies of the springs, I do not understand how to relate them.
 
kppc1407 said:
When I find the frequencies of the springs, I do not understand how to relate them.

I told you how.

Calculate frequency 1 with k = k1, frequency 2 with k = k2, and f with k = k1 + k2.

f_1 = \frac{1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{k_1}{m}}
f_2 = \frac{1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{k_2}{m}}
f = \frac{1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{k_1 + k_2}{m}} because k = k_1 + k_2 and nothing else changes.

Next, plug f_1 and f_2 into f=\sqrt{f_1^2+f_2^2} to see if you get the same expression as above for f.
(you do)
 
Last edited:
Oh, I was going a different route using a different equation making it more complicated. Thank you for your help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top