Oscillation of a point charge perpendicular to field lines

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time period of oscillation for a charge displaced perpendicular to two fixed charges. The initial attempt to derive the force acting on the charge incorrectly suggested a formula that lacked dependence on the separation distance D and was dimensionally flawed. Participants emphasize that the force should account for the distance between the charges, noting that the force is zero when the charge is at the midpoint. Clarification is sought on how the force depends on charge separation and the resulting components after cancellation. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate force equations in solving oscillation problems in electrostatics.
CrazyNeutrino
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two particles A and B each carry a charge Q and are separated by a fixed distance D. A particle c with charge q and mass m is kept at the midpoint of A and B. If C is displaced perpendicular to AB by a distance x where x<<<D,
find the time period of the oscillation of the charge.

Homework Equations


$$F=\frac{Qq}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 x^3} \cdot \hat{x}$$
$$a=-\omega^2 x$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I started off by trying to find an expression for the force acting on the particle. Since the components of the force parallel to AB cancel out because the charges at A & B are the same, I took the vector sum of the perpendicular force in the ##\hat{x}## direction.
$$ma=-\frac{2Qq}{4\pi\epsilon_0 x^3}\cdot \hat{x}$$

I then solved for ##a## and plugged the coefficients into ##a=\omega^2 x##.
This gives:
$$\omega^2=\frac{Qq}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 x^3}$$
$$ \frac{2\pi}{T}=\sqrt{\frac{Qq}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 x^3}} $$
$$ T = \sqrt{\frac{8\pi^3\epsilon_0 x^3 m}{qQ}}$$

This is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation $$F=\frac{Qq}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 x^3} \cdot \hat{x}$$ is incorrect. There should be dependence on D, the separation between the fixed charges. It's also dimensionally incorrect and predicts that F is infinite when x = 0. Actually, F = 0 when x = 0.
 
kuruman said:
Your equation $$F=\frac{Qq}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 x^3} \cdot \hat{x}$$ is incorrect. There should be dependence on D, the separation between the fixed charges. It's also dimensionally incorrect and predicts that F is infinite when x = 0. Actually, F = 0 when x = 0.
I understand the dimensionality argument. How and why does the force depend on the charge separation though? Wouldn’t those components cancel each other out?
 
CrazyNeutrino said:
How and why does the force depend on the charge separation though?
What is the magnitude of the force exerted by one charge Q? What direction is it in? What component is left after cancellation by the force from the other charge?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
603
Replies
9
Views
694
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
782
Replies
6
Views
816
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top