Outer area of S = outer area of S closure, analysis

missavvy
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the outer area of S = outer area of the closure of S

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't really understand 100% the difference between the set S and the closure of S.
I know the closure is S \cup \partialS (the boundary of S), but then what does that mean S is? Since S is not the same as the interior of S or the closure..

Anyways,
Let A denote the outer area.

I'm starting by showing that A(S) \leq A(Cls).

Let a partition of a rectangle which contains R, P= {xi, yj} Then
S = upper sum, 1 = characteristic function

Sp(1s) = \sum Mij A(Rij)

Where Mij = sup{1s(x,y); (x,y) belong to Rij}

I'm trying to figure out how the rectangles are defined in S, is it just Rij \capS?
Then
Sp(1s) \leq \sum Mij A(Rij) = Sp1[Cls(S)]
Rij \cap S & Rij \cap \partialS
Anyways once I show that A(S)\leq A(Cls), I think the other inequality will be harder.. any tips?

If possible, could someone maybe describe it as a picture? I find I understand this stuff much better visually..

Thanks :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's think in R, for a minute. And let's think about the open interval (0,1) in particular. Now, think about placing a divider to the left of 0 and one to the right of 0. Now slide the two dividers together as far as they can go without actually touching either a point of (0,1) or a boundary point of (0,1). The stuff between the dividers is the closure of (0,1). In other words, it is kind of like putting a fence on the boundary points of a set and then saying everything on the inside of the fence, and the fence it self is the closure of that set.

So, open sets do not contain their boundaries, that is the difference.

Can you show that the boundary of a set S takes up no "area" (whatever "area" is)?
 
Yes, if the boundary has zero content. So if were to show that the area of the boundary, which is a part of the closure, has no area then they would be equal.
 
missavvy said:
Yes, if the boundary has zero content. So if were to show that the area of the boundary, which is a part of the closure, has no area then they would be equal.

Correct, since the closure of a set consists of the boundary points of the set and the sets interior points.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top