<p> Operator on Probability Density in X-Space

Legaldose
Messages
73
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Consider a particle whose wave function is:

\Psi(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{ccc} <br /> 2\alpha^{3/2}xe^{-\alpha x} &amp; \text{if} &amp; x&gt; 0\\ <br /> 0 &amp; \text{if} &amp; x\leq 0<br /> \end{array}\right.

Calculate <p> using the \hat{p} operator on probability density in x space.


Homework Equations



\hat{p}=-i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}

The Attempt at a Solution


So I'm pretty sure I'm missing something, I figured since you take the derivative then do the integral, they will "cancel" each other, then you can just evaluate -ih|Psi|^2 from 0 to infinity, in which case you get 0. Here is my work:

&lt;p&gt; =\int_{0}^{\infty}\hat{p}|\Psi(x)|^{2}dx=\int_{0}^{\infty}-i \hbar 4\alpha^{3} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} x^{2} e^{-2 \alpha x}dx=-i \hbar 4\alpha^{3}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} x^{2} e^{-2 \alpha x}dx

Then when you take the derivative, then integrate it over that range:

=-i \hbar 4\alpha^{3} x^{2} e^{-2 \alpha x}|_{0}^{\infty}=0

And when you evaluate this it goes to 0, did I do something wrong? TBH, I did miss this lecture, and unfortunately my professor forgot to record it like he usually does, so I had to take notes from his PowerPoint, as well as a friend. If it matters, I have already found <p>, but only after I did the Fourier Transform from the position space. It turned out to be:

&lt;p&gt; =\frac{-\alpha \hbar}{3\pi}

If I did it correctly. So can anyone give me insight on what I did wrong? Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
$$\langle \hat{p}\rangle = \int_0^\infty \psi^\star (x)\hat{p}\psi (x) dx$$ ... spot the difference.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Oh, I see my problem, thank you, so I need to apply the p operator to psi before multiplying by the conjugate?
 
That's the one - the relation you used only works for operators like position.
In general, the operator goes in between the wavefunctions.

In Dirac notation: <Q>=<ψ|Q|ψ>
 
Yes, and the complete derivation is as follows
\langle A \rangle =\langle \psi|\mathbf{A}| \psi \rangle= \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x \langle \psi|x \rangle \langle x|\mathbf{A}|\psi \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x \; \psi^*(x) \hat{A} \psi(x).
Note that there is a subtle difference in my use of symbols. While \mathbf{A} is the operator representing the observable A in abstract (basis independent) Hilbert space, \hat{A} denotes the representation of the operator in position representation. Your equation for \hat{p} is of course correct.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top