Parallel Plate Capacitor and Battery

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculations related to a parallel plate capacitor connected to a battery. The charge on the top plate is determined to be 3.5*10^-9 C, and the energy stored in the capacitor is 1.05 * 10^-8 J. When the battery is disconnected and the plate separation is doubled, the energy stored in the new configuration needs to be recalculated, with the understanding that the charge remains constant. There is confusion regarding the formulas used for energy and electric field calculations, particularly in relation to the new potential difference after the separation change. Clarifications are requested on the correct formulas for energy and electric field in this context.
tristanm
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


h7_plateA.png

Two parallel plates, each having area A = 3558 cm2 are connected to the terminals of a battery of voltage Vb = 6 V as shown. The plates are separated by a distance d = 0.54 cm.

1) What is Q the charge on the top plate? 3.5*10^-9 C
2) What is U, the energy stored in this capacitor? 1.05 * 10^-8 J
3) The battery is now disconnected from the plates and the separation of the plates is doubled ( = 1.08 cm). What is the energy stored in this new capacitor?
4) What is E, the magnitude of the electric field in the region between plates?
5) Compare V, the magnitude of the new potential difference across the plates to Vb, the voltage of the battery. V > Vb
6)Two uncharged parallel plates are now connected to the initial pair of plates as shown. How will the electric field, E, and potential difference across the plates, V, change, if at all? Both E and V will decrease?

Homework Equations


U = (1/2)*Epsilon-naught*E^2
Q=C*V

The Attempt at a Solution


So the problems I'm having are 3 and 4. For three, even if the battery is disconnected, the voltage will remain the same as well as the charges, and therefore the capacitance. Once the distance is doubled, the charge will remain the same, and the capacitance, meaning the voltage needs to be doubled to maintain C and Q at the same values. Therefore, the new U should equal (1/2)*Epsilon-naught*E^2 = (1/2)*Epsilon-naught*(V/d)^2

Plugging in V=12volts, d= 0.0054m and the standard 8.854*10^-12, I get 2.18*10^-7J which is incorrect.

As for question 5, wouldn't doing 12V/0.0054m give E? It isn't obviously, however I'm having trouble understanding why.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're using the wrong formula for U. There is a formula that relates U, Q, and V. Do you know it? How did you answer question 2?

For question 5. Didn't the distance double to 1.08 cm?
 
dauto said:
You're using the wrong formula for U. There is a formula that relates U, Q, and V. Do you know it? How did you answer question 2?

For question 5. Didn't the distance double to 1.08 cm?

Thanks for the answer,

Yes it did double to 1.08 cm. It was a typo on my part.

In terms of question 2, I really have no idea. I played around with some equations and subbed them into each other and ended up with the correct answer. I can have a quick look at my notes when I get back home, however I can't recally the formula for U off the top of my head at the moment. Can I get a refresher?
 
Your formula for U is the energy density, energy per unit volume. You need the whole energy of the capacitor.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top