Parity and integration in spherical coordinates

KostasV
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello people!
I have ended up to this integral ##\int_{φ=0}^{2π} \int_{θ=0}^π \sin θ \ \cos θ~Y_{00}^*~Y_{00}~dθ \, dφ## while I was solving a problem.
I know that in spherical coordinates when ##\vec r → -\vec r## :
1) The magnitude of ##\vec r## does not change : ##r' → r##
2) The angles ##θ## and ##φ## change like ##θ' → π-θ## and ##φ' → π+φ##
3) So parity of spherical harmonics is ##\hat P## ##Y_{lm}(θ,φ)## ##=## ##Y_{lm}(θ',φ')=(-1)^l## ##Y_{lm}(θ,φ)##
4) Parity of ##\cos θ## and ##\sin θ## are ##\cos θ'## ##=## ##(-1)## ##\cos θ## and ##\sin θ'## ##=## ##\sin θ## respectively.
This means that in my case the integrated function has Parity equal to ##(-1)## .

So my question is:
Can I say that this integral is zero because of the odd (=parity is equal to (-1)) integrated funtion? Because in the xy plane when we integrate an odd function ##F(x)=-F(-x)## in a symmetric space (e.g. ##\int_{-a}^a F(x) \, dx## with F being odd) we can say that it is zero without to calculate it.
If yes, can I do this in general? meaning, if i get a random function in spherical coordinates which depends only from angles θ and φ and i want to integrate it with these limits: ##\int_{φ=0}^{2π} \int_{θ=0}^π randomF(θ,φ) \, dθ \, dφ## , can i find its parity and say if it is zero or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, ##\mathrm{Y}_{00}=1/\sqrt{4 \pi}=\text{const}## and your integral thus is
$$\propto \int_0^{\pi} \mathrm{d} \vartheta \sin \vartheta \cos \vartheta=\int_0^{\pi} \mathrm{d} \vartheta \frac{1}{2} \sin(2 \vartheta)= \left .-\frac{1}{4} \cos(2 \vartheta)\right|_0^{\pi}=0.$$
 
vanhees71 said:
Well, ##\mathrm{Y}_{00}=1/\sqrt{4 \pi}=\text{const}## and your integral thus is
$$\propto \int_0^{\pi} \mathrm{d} \vartheta \sin \vartheta \cos \vartheta=\int_0^{\pi} \mathrm{d} \vartheta \frac{1}{2} \sin(2 \vartheta)= \left .-\frac{1}{4} \cos(2 \vartheta)\right|_0^{\pi}=0.$$
Ok that was an easy integral but what if i have something more complicated like ##\int_{φ=0}^{2π} \int_{θ=0}^π \sin θ \ \cos θ~Y_{11}^*~Y_{1-1}~dθ \, dφ## ? If we use parity here we see that the parity of the integrated function is (-1) and the integral must be zero! No calculations ! Just used parity !
My question is not how to solve the integral making calculations . I want to solve it using parity and i want to tell me if my thoughts are correct on how to use parity in order to solve these integrals!
Thanks btw for your response :)
 
KostasV said:
Can I say that this integral is zero because of the odd (=parity is equal to (-1)) integrated funtion?
Yes you can. Just remember that not every function has definite parity.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Yes you can. Just remember that not every function has definite parity.
Thank you very much ! :)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top