Parity in the \eta to two photon decay

fliptomato
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Greetings, I'm curious about parity conservation in the decay\eta \rightarrow \gamma \gamma. The \eta has odd parity, while the product of the two photon parities (each is odd) is even. Now, parity is conserved in the EM interactions, so there must be a factor of (-1) coming in from orbital angular momentum factors--but the two photon final state has no orbital angular momentum. What am I missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IN SHORT : PARITY DOES NOT ADD UP LINEARLY...

I mean : in order for the two-photon state to have J = 0 (conservation of J we must write it as a superposition of two states A and B. Each state has the two photons with anti-parallel spins and in state A the photonspin is aligned with the photon-momentum, in B photon spin is opposite wrt photon momentum. You can derive these states by using the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.

A photon has indeed parity -1 but since we are working with a superposition of TWO photonstates, the parity is relative. If you had just a single two-photon state then parity would be -1 * -1 but because of the superposition, it is the parity from state A with respect to state B that determins the actual parity of the entire wavefunction...

regards
marlon

More to be found here
 
fliptomato said:
Greetings, I'm curious about parity conservation in the decay\eta \rightarrow \gamma \gamma. The \eta has odd parity, while the product of the two photon parities (each is odd) is even. Now, parity is conserved in the EM interactions, so there must be a factor of (-1) coming in from orbital angular momentum factors--but the two photon final state has no orbital angular momentum. What am I missing here?

In \eta-->2\gamma, there is orbital angular momentum l=1, which gives the factor (-1)^l. The angular momentum addition for the photon spins must be S=1+1=1, and then l+S=1+1=0.
The eta decay is the same as the pi^0 decay. The parity of the pi^0, and of the eta^0, were determined by the relative plane polarizations of the two photons, which can be found from the spin addition 1+1=1.
This was first done by Yang.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top