Parllel Plate Capacitors Connected Opposite

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fizzicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors Plate
AI Thread Summary
Two capacitors, C1 (9.8 µF) and C2 (4.0 µF), are initially connected in parallel to a 30 V battery. After disconnecting them from the battery and each other, they are reconnected with opposite plates together, prompting a need to calculate the energy decrease in the system. The initial charge on each capacitor is calculated using Q = CV, and the user seeks guidance on whether to recalculate the voltage after reconnection. It is noted that when capacitors are connected in series, they share the same charge, necessitating a new charge calculation for both capacitors. The discussion emphasizes the importance of determining the new stored energy to find the energy decrease.
Fizzicist
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two capacitors are connected parallel to each other and connected to the battery with voltage 30 V. Let C1 = 9.8 micro F,C2 = 4.0 micro F be their capacitances. Suppose the charged capacitors are disconnected from the source and from each other, and then reconnected to each other with plates of opposite sign together.By how much does the energy of the system decrease?

Homework Equations



U = (1/2)QVFor PPC connected in parallel,

Q1 = C1V and Q2 = C2V

Ceq = C1 + C2 + C3...

The Attempt at a Solution



I found the charge stored on the plates initially, and was trying to find the charge stored on them after they were reconnect, but failed. I really don't know what to do. Do I have to find the new voltage too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If someone could just tell me if I have to recalculate a new potential difference, that would be great. I really have no clue how to proceed from here.
 
Can anyone help me with this? It's very frustrating, and I'm not quite sure how to approach it.
 
Note that when you connect the capacitors in series, they have the same charge on each other. So now you have to find the new charge on both of them and add up the stored energy in both.
 
  • Like
Likes yeshuamo
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top