Partial differential equation - change of variables.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a partial differential equation (PDE) given by 2dz/dx - dz/dy = 0. Participants are exploring how to demonstrate that the solution z = f(x + 2y) satisfies this PDE, particularly through the application of the chain rule and a change of variables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the chain rule to express derivatives of z in terms of the new variables t and s. There is an attempt to clarify how the change of variables simplifies the original PDE.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the application of the chain rule and the implications of the change of variables. However, there remains a lack of complete understanding among some members regarding the steps involved in the transformation and the reasoning behind them.

Contextual Notes

One participant expresses confusion about the material, indicating that these are notes from a recent class and that they are seeking clarification on the concepts discussed. There is also a mention of the importance of understanding the chain rule in this context.

mathman44
Messages
204
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the PDE:

[tex]2dz/dx[/tex] - [tex]dz/dy[/tex] = 0

How can I show that if f(u) is differentiable function of one variable, then the PDE above is satisfied by z = f(x +2y)?

Also, the change in variables t = x+2y, s=x reduces the above PDE to [tex]dz/dt[/tex] = 0. But how can I show this?

The Attempt at a Solution



I simply don't understand, these are my notes from class today and I want to understand while it's early... All I know is that this involves the chain rule.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shameless bump. This is driving me nuts!
 
mathman44 said:

Homework Statement



Consider the PDE:

[tex]2dz/dx[/tex] - [tex]dz/dy[/tex] = 0

How can I show that if f(u) is differentiable function of one variable, then the PDE above is satisfied by z = f(x +2y)?
Let u= x+ 2y and use the chain rule: [itex]\partial f/\partial x= (df/du)(\partial u/\partial x)[/itex]= f'(u)(1)= f'(u) and [itex]\partial f/\partial y= (df/du)(\partial u/\partial y)= f'(u)(2)= 2f'(u)[/itex]. Put those into the equation and see what happens.

Also, the change in variables t = x+2y, s=x reduces the above PDE to [tex]dz/dt[/tex] = 0. But how can I show this?
If t= x+ 2y and s= x, then x= s and t= s+ 2y so 2y= t- s and y= (t-s)/2. Now, [itex]\partial z/\partial x= (\partial z/\partial t)(\partial t/\partial t)+[/itex][itex](\partial z/\partial s)(\partial s/\partial x)[/itex][itex]= 1(\partial z/\partial t)+ 1(\partial z/\partial s)= \partial z/\partial t+ \partial z/\partial s[/itex] and [itex]\partial z/\partial y= (\partial z/\partial t)(\partial t)\partial y)+ (\partial z/\partial s)(\partial s/\partial y)[/itex][itex]= 2 \partial z/\partial t+ 0\partial z/\partial s= 2\partial z/\partial t[/itex].

Putting those into [itex]2\partial z/\partial x-\partial z/\partial y= 0[/itex] and it becomes [itex]2(\partial z/\partial t+ \partial z/\partial s)- 2\partial z/\partial t= 0[/itex].

The two "[itex]2\partial z/\partial t[/itex]" terms cancel leaving [itex]2\partial z/\partial s= 0[/itex] which is equivalent to [itex]\partial z/\partial s= 0[/itex] which says that z does not depend upon s at all. Since any dependence on t alone satisfies that, z= f(t), for t any differentiable function, satisfies that equation.

The Attempt at a Solution



I simply don't understand, these are my notes from class today and I want to understand while it's early... All I know is that this involves the chain rule.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks so much, that makes it seem very intuitive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K