Partial Fraction Deconstruction: Int Tutorial

  • Thread starter Thread starter suspenc3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction Partial
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of rational functions, specifically focusing on partial fraction decomposition and numerical methods for approximating integrals, such as the trapezoidal rule.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the method of partial fraction decomposition, questioning the equating of coefficients and discussing the need for additional terms when dealing with irreducible quadratics. Others raise questions about the use of calculators in applying the trapezoidal rule and express skepticism about the relevance of these numerical methods.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct form for partial fraction decomposition, while others are debating the necessity and practicality of using calculators for numerical integration. Multiple perspectives on the effectiveness of the trapezoidal rule versus other methods are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of varying levels of comfort with complex numbers and numerical methods among participants, as well as differing expectations regarding the use of calculators in homework settings.

suspenc3
Messages
400
Reaction score
0
Hi, here is my question:

[tex]\int \frac{dx}{(x-2)(x^2+4)}[/tex]...for some reason I can't equate the coefficients?..is there something else.i used A/x-2 + B/(x^2+4)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you have an irreducible quadratic polynomial in the denominator, you have to expand it as follows:

[tex]\frac{A}{x-2}+\frac{Bx+C}{x^2+4}[/tex]

Now you have as many equations (equating the coefficients of 1, x and x2 after multiplying across by the denominator) as unknowns (A,B,C).
 
ohhh..ok Thanks!
 
I have another question..Im just starting ttrapezoidal rule, are you suppose to use a calculator or?
 
What are you trying to do? If your goal is to numerically approximate the integral of a function that can't be done analytically, you should use a computer program. If you're just supposed to demonstrate the trapezoidal rule for small numbers of intervals (ie, a few, wide trapezoids), then it depends. Sometimes you can find an exact expression for the sum of their areas, as in the case of the function f(x)=x, and sometimes this may be difficult and you'll just want to add up the areas on your calculator.
 
I've always wondered why they teach the trapezoidal rule anyway. Obviously if you are looking for an approximation to a non-integrable (sp?) function then you will use a better method like Simpson's rule, and for anything that you would be able to use the trapezoidal rule with any close approximation you might as well just use rectangles.

Anyway, I'd imagine that you're supposed to use a calculator to go through the approximations, or if it is one of that calc classes where you aren't allowed to use a calculator then you should just put all your work down and they will grade based on that (so much easier).
 
Hi, late response sorry, I am doing pretty complex numbers..I don't think I could do them in my head..like [tex](1.6+1)^1^/^4[/tex] and cosine of a fraction etc...Ive never really used a calculator fot he past 3 years and I don't see why we would all of a sudden need one... Also..is it just me or is the trap and simpson rule pointless and out of place..it just seems too easy...i dddddddunno
 
Last edited:
If you can compute 2.6^(1/4) in your head then kudos. I'd save time and use a calculator. (Which is what I suspect you're intended to do)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K