Particle decay rates, CKM matrix etc

sunrah
Messages
191
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


Calculate following decay rate

\frac{\Gamma(D_{0} \rightarrow K^{-} \pi^{+})}{\Gamma(D_{0} \rightarrow \pi^{+} \pi^{-})}<br />

Use the (Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa) CKM-matrix.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



D^{0} = |cu\rangle , D^{+} = |cd\rangle , B^{0} = |bd\rangle , D_{s}^{+} = |cs\rangle , K^{-} = |su\rangle , π^{+} = |ud\rangle<br />

I know only that in the numerator decay the charm quark couples with a strange quark, so the CKM matrix element Vcs would describe this decay? In the denominator decay d-quark couples with c-quark, so would this decay be described by CKM-matrix element Vcd?

EDITED:
Is then the ratio: \left(\frac{V_{cs}}{V_{cd}}\right)^{2}

thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about, how the decay rate is related with the S-matrix element!
 
hello,

sorry I don't know what an S-matrix is, this isn't covered in our syllabus

is decay rate not proportional to coupling CKM-matrix element?
 
Last edited:
Ok, so how have you made the connection between the CKM-matrix elements to the decay rate?

The S matrix contains the observable results of computations in quantum field theory. It gives the transition probability rates for scattering (or in your case decay) processes. It's in fact a pretty delicate issue, related to the socalled LSZ-reduction formalism. After the qft dust has settled, the S-matrix elements are what you calculate perturbatively with help of the Feynman-diagram rules. Take any good book on QFT to learn about it. Peskin/Schroeder is pretty good in explaining it.
 
Thanks, but it must be possible to work out Gamma, at least proportionally, just from CKM otherwise our tutors would not have set the question. I think rates are amplitude squared so it should be \Gamma_{ij} \propto |V_{ij}|^{2}
 
I think the answer you got is the intended way to answer the problem.

If you compare it to the actual fraction, it will not match (it is even worse if you compare ##D^0 \ \to KK## with ##D^0 \to \pi \pi##). This comes from other processes (the tree-level decay is not the only option), phase space and probably some other effects.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top