Particle falling into a black hole singularity within a finite proper time

camipol89
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Can anyone help me with that?
It's a problem taken from Wald book on General Relativity,in the section of Schwarzschild solution
Thanks


Show that any particle (not necessarily in geodesic motion) in region II (r <
2M ) of the extended Schwarzschild spacetime, Figure 6.9, must decrease
its radial coordinate at a rate given by |dr/dτ | ≥ [2M/r − 1]1/2 . Hence,
show that the maximum lifetime of any observer in region II is τ = πM
[∼ 10−5 (M/M⊙ ) s], i.e., any observer in region II will be pulled into the
singularity at r = 0 within this proper time. Show that this maximum time
is approached by freely falling (i.e., geodesic) motion from r = 2M with
E → 0.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For part 1, the world-line of a free-falling particle must be timelike. Write down the appropriate condition for this to be true.
 
I thought about it but I'm not sure wether should I use schwarzschild coordinates nor kruskal coordinate,since I'm supposed to be in a regon with r<2M.
The proper time for the obsverver is,I think, d/dτ= [(2M/r) − 1]^-1/2.
The thing is is,when I try to write down the explicit expression for dr/dτ I don't know what to do...Should I use the fact that the velocity I'm calculating is a timelike vector and thus has norm = -1?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top