Particle in a box Schrodinger equation

gkiverm
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm going though the particle in a box lesson in my physics textbook right now. I understand all the math, but don't understand a lot of the physics behind it. Also this is an intro physics course, we're only covering the basics of quantum mechanics and not going into too much detail.

How come we use the time independent Schrodinger equation for the particle in a box problem? In general, do you always use the time independent Schrodinger equation for stationary state (energy is known with no uncertainty)?

Why is the potential energy of the particle inside the box always equal to zero and infinite outside the box?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem involves a time-independent potential which is why we resort to the time-independent Schrodinger equation. When you have a time-independent potential you can use separation of variables to write the coordinate representation of the state vector (i.e. the position wave-function) as ##\Psi(\mathbf{x},t) = \psi(\mathbf{x})\varphi(t)##. Plugging this into the time-dependent Schrodinger equation it is easy to show that ##\varphi = e^{-iEt/\hbar}## and ##\frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2 \psi + V\psi = E\psi## where ##E## is the separation constant; the latter of these is the time-independent Schrodinger equation.

The solutions ##\psi## are eigenstates of the Hamiltonian operator that you see on the left hand side of the equation of motion for ##\psi##; we identify ##E## as the total energy since this is the observable associated with the Hamiltonian operator.

For the particle in a box problem we have ##V = 0## inside the box and ##V = \infty## at the walls of the box because that's how the system is setup. We want the particle to be confined to a finite volume in space but be free within this finite volume so we have zero potential inside (hence it is free inside) while placing an infinite potential barrier in the form of a box to keep the particle confined inside.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top