Particle in a magnetic field -- question

AI Thread Summary
The calculation for the radius of a particle in a magnetic field was performed using the formula R=mv/qb, yielding a diameter of 8.2e-4 m. The reference site provided an answer of 3.95e+10 m, which raised questions about its validity. Without proper units, both answers were initially deemed meaningless, but clarification confirmed that the diameter should be in meters. The consensus is that the reference site's value is unrealistic, as it suggests a diameter comparable to a significant astronomical distance. Therefore, the calculated diameter of 8.2e-4 m is considered correct, likely indicating a typo in the reference.
Cyclone Charlie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Question: An alpha particle (a He nucleus, containing two protons
and two neutrons and having a mass of 6.64 * 10-27 kg) traveling
horizontally at 35.6 km/s enters a uniform, vertical, 1.80-T magnetic field.
(a) What is the diameter of the path followed by this alpha particle?
Relevant Equations
R=mv/qb
I went with R=mv/qb, thus -> 6.64e-27*35.6e3/2*1.6e-19*1.8, and got 4.1e-4 m (metres), so diameter is 2R, 8.2e-4 m, as an answer, the reference site gives 3.95e+10 m as the answer, who's right here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Cyclone Charlie and welcome to PF.

Cyclone Charlie said:
the reference site gives 3.95e+10 as the answer, who's right here?
3.95e+10 what? Apples, bananas, oranges? Without units a number is meaningless unless it is dimensionless, which in this case it cannot be. Same with your answer of 4.1e-4, meaningless. It is not possible to tell who is right and who is not.
 
Sorry Kuruman, forgot the units, the answer for the diameter is in metres.
 
OK, do you think that the answer of 4 e+10 m for the diameter is realistic? That's about one-quarter the Sun-Earth distance. I cannot speak for your reference and how they got the absurd answer, but your answer is correct. Theirs must be a typo.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top