Particle in a magnetic field -- question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a particle moving in a magnetic field, specifically focusing on the calculation of the radius and diameter of the particle's path. Participants are comparing their results with a reference answer that appears significantly larger.

Discussion Character

  • Assumption checking, Problem interpretation, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the radius using the formula R=mv/qb and expresses confusion over differing results. Some participants question the validity of the reference answer due to its unrealistic magnitude, while others emphasize the importance of including units in calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the discrepancies in the answers provided. Some guidance has been offered regarding the necessity of units in calculations, and there is a critical examination of the reference answer's plausibility.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of clarity regarding the reference answer's context and the assumptions made in the calculations. Participants are also addressing the implications of the results in relation to physical reality.

Cyclone Charlie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Question: An alpha particle (a He nucleus, containing two protons
and two neutrons and having a mass of 6.64 * 10-27 kg) traveling
horizontally at 35.6 km/s enters a uniform, vertical, 1.80-T magnetic field.
(a) What is the diameter of the path followed by this alpha particle?
Relevant Equations
R=mv/qb
I went with R=mv/qb, thus -> 6.64e-27*35.6e3/2*1.6e-19*1.8, and got 4.1e-4 m (metres), so diameter is 2R, 8.2e-4 m, as an answer, the reference site gives 3.95e+10 m as the answer, who's right here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Cyclone Charlie and welcome to PF.

Cyclone Charlie said:
the reference site gives 3.95e+10 as the answer, who's right here?
3.95e+10 what? Apples, bananas, oranges? Without units a number is meaningless unless it is dimensionless, which in this case it cannot be. Same with your answer of 4.1e-4, meaningless. It is not possible to tell who is right and who is not.
 
Sorry Kuruman, forgot the units, the answer for the diameter is in metres.
 
OK, do you think that the answer of 4 e+10 m for the diameter is realistic? That's about one-quarter the Sun-Earth distance. I cannot speak for your reference and how they got the absurd answer, but your answer is correct. Theirs must be a typo.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
767
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K