Particle moving in polar coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a problem involving a particle moving in polar coordinates, specifically showing that radial acceleration is zero when θ=1/√2 radians. The equations provided include r=Aθ and θ=(1/2)αt², with A defined as 1/π meters per radian. The challenge lies in deriving the radial acceleration, which is expressed as a_r=(d²r/dt² - r(dθ/dt)²). Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the vector nature of velocity and acceleration in polar coordinates, and suggest substituting the given functions into the derived acceleration formula to solve the problem. A clear explanation of the derivation process is sought to aid in understanding the solution.
Disserate
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Equations given:

r=A\theta

\theta=\frac{1}{2}\alphat^{2}

A=\frac{1}{\pi} meters per radian

\alpha is a given constant


Asks to show that radial acceleration is zero when \theta=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} radians.

I have tried rearranging, plugging in, and deriving to try to solve this problem to no avail. I do not know exactly how to go about doing this. I do desire an answer, but even more do I desire an explanation on how to do this. Also, i apologize for not using the template, but I did not like it very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both velocity and acceleration are vectors, having magnitude and direction. The velocity is the time derivative of the position vector and the acceleration is the time derivative of the velocity, or second derivative of the position vector.
You certainly know that in case of uniform circular motion there is centripetal acceleration which is of radial direction, parallel with the position vector, but points towards the centre. But this problem is totally different. It is a spiral, the distance from the centre increases with the turning angle, so there is an extra radial acceleration because of the increase of r.

Do you know how you can write a vector with its polar coordinates, using the polar unit vectors er and eθ? You can read this, especially the part about the derivatives of the position vector r

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PolarCoordinates.html

The position vector is simply \vec r=r \vec {e_\theta}, the velocity is \vec v=\dot{\vec r} and the acceleration is \vec a=\dot{\vec v}

From mathworld, (or from your notes,)you can learn that the acceleration is
\vec a=(\ddot{r} -r\dot \theta^2)\vec e_r+(2 \dot r \dot \theta+r \ddot {\theta})\vec e_{\theta}

The radial component of acceleration is a_r=(\ddot{r} -r\dot \theta^2)

Substitute the given functions for r and theta and do the derivations.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top