Particle oscillating around equilibrium radius

AbigailM
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m moving in three dimensions is attracted to the origin by the gravitational force of a much heavier object. It can be shown that the radial motion is governed by the following equation
m\ddot{r}=-\frac{k}{r^{2}}+\frac{l^{2}}{mr^{3}}

where k is a constant and l is the angular momentum. Determine an equilibrium radius r_{0} in terms of k, l, and m. If the particle is put near that equilibrium radius, r=r_{0}+\epsilon(where \epsilon << r_{0}), it will have an oscillatory radial motion about r_{0}. What will be the frequency of that oscillation?

The Attempt at a Solution


Attached to thread as I'm horribly slow at typing latex.
 

Attachments

  • F10-7sol.jpg
    F10-7sol.jpg
    25.9 KB · Views: 468
Physics news on Phys.org
Your final answer looks correct, but I'm not quite sure what it is you've done to get it. Specifically, why do you assert that \omega=\sqrt{\frac{1}{m}\frac{d^2U_{eff}}{dr^2}}? Is the RHS of this equation even a constant?

The method I would suggest is to just plug r=r_0+\epsilon into your equation of motion and Taylor expand the RHS of it in powers of \frac{\epsilon}{r_0} (since you know that it is much smaller than one).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top