Particle waves through a potential barrier

DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I came across this figure in a textbook. Simple stuff, but can get tricky:

Screen_Shot_2015_08_14_at_11_49_49_PM.png


I don't understand why the sign convention flips upon entering the barrier (region II), but I guess the book is correct and that I should just take it as a fact.

If anybody has a reasonable thought to add so I'm making sense out of this rather than just accepting it, please let me know.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physical intuition, a barrier is supposed to prevent a particle from passing through, therefore we must expect the probability to find the particle beyond the barrier is lower than it is before.
 
What do you mean by sign convention? The solution to the schrodinger equation for a particle in a region where the potential is larger than the energy is a sum of a decaying and growing exponentials.
 
You're free to swap the signs on the exponents in the A2 and B2 terms when setting up the solution, but then the values of A2 and B2 will also get swapped when you actually work out the solution.
 
Last edited:
Hey thanks for the explanation, jtbell. That makes sense now.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top