Partitioning into Isomorphism Classes: Exam Q&A

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Zorba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classes Isomorphism
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around partitioning a list of groups into isomorphism classes as part of an exam question. Participants explore the properties of various groups, including their orders and structures, to determine potential isomorphisms. The focus is primarily on theoretical aspects of group theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that groups 2 and 9 can be grouped together, as well as groups 4 and 5, with the remaining groups in separate classes.
  • Another participant agrees with the grouping of 2 and 9, and proposes a partition of 2, 7, and 9 together, with 1 and 8 grouped, and 4 and 5 together, leaving 3, 6, and 10 separate.
  • There is a challenge regarding the isomorphism of group 1 to group 8 due to differing orders, indicating uncertainty about their relationship.
  • One participant corrects their earlier assertion about the fourth roots of unity, clarifying that it is cyclic of order 4 and thus not isomorphic to any other group discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the isomorphism relationships between several groups, particularly regarding groups 1, 8, and the fourth roots of unity. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the correct partitioning of the groups into isomorphism classes.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various assumptions about group orders and properties, but there are unresolved questions about the relationships between certain groups, particularly in terms of their isomorphism.

Zorba
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Just had an exam there, one of the questions was

Partition the list of groups below into isomorphism classes

1.\mathbb{Z}_8

2.\mathbb{Z}_8^* (elements of Z_8 relatively prime to 8)

3.\mathbb{Z}_4 \times \mathbb{Z}_2

4.\mathbb{Z}_{14} \times \mathbb{Z}_5

5.\mathbb{Z}_{10} \times \mathbb{Z}_7

6.D_{70} Symmetries of a regular 35-gon.

7.\mathcal{P}\{1,2\} with symmetric difference as operation.

8.Fourth roots of unity

9.\langle (12)(34),(13)(24)\rangle \le S_4

10. The set generated by the matrix representations of the quaternions.


I don't feel confident about my answers, but I said that 2+9, 4+5, and the rest in separate classes.
I grouped them first by order and then mainly examined element orders, but I'm pretty sure I left some out. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Zorba! :smile:

I hope your exam was a good one. Here are my thoughts on the matter:
Zorba said:
Just had an exam there, one of the questions was

Partition the list of groups below into isomorphism classes

1.\mathbb{Z}_8

Cyclic group with 8 elements.

2.\mathbb{Z}_8^* (elements of Z_8 relatively prime to 8)

This group contains the elements {1,3,5,7}, thus the group has order 4. The only groups of order 4 are \mathbb{Z}_4 and \mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2. Checking the orders of all elements gives us that all elements have order at most 2. Thus the group is \mathbb{Z}_2\times \mathbb{Z}_2.

3.\mathbb{Z}_4 \times \mathbb{Z}_2

Group of order 8. Not cyclic. Thus not isomorphic to 1.

4.\mathbb{Z}_{14} \times \mathbb{Z}_5

Group of order 70. Abelian. Isomorphic to \mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_5\times\mathbb{Z}_7.

5.\mathbb{Z}_{10} \times \mathbb{Z}_7

Group of order 70. Abelian. Isomorphic to \mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_5\times\mathbb{Z}_7. Isomorphic to 4.

6.D_{70} Symmetries of a regular 35-gon.

Group of order 70. Non-abelian. Not isomorphic to 4 or 5.

7.\mathcal{P}\{1,2\} with symmetric difference as operation.

Group of order 4. Denote that A+A=0 for all elements A. Thus the group is isomorphic to \mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2[/tex]. Isomorphic to 2.<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> 8.Fourth roots of unity </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> Group of order 8. Cyclic with generator i^{1/2}. Thus is isomorphic to 1.<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> 9.\langle (12)(34),(13)(24)\rangle \leq S_4 </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> Group contains elements {(12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23),1}. Group contains 4 elements and all elements have order at most 2. Isomorphic to \mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2. Isomorphic to 2,7.<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> 10. The set generated by the matrix representations of the quaternions. </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> Group of order 8, non-abelian. Not isomorphic to 3,8<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> I don&#039;t feel confident about my answers, but I said that 2+9, 4+5, and the rest in separate classes.<br /> I grouped them first by order and then mainly examined element orders, but I&#039;m pretty sure I left some out. Any thoughts? </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> I think the partition is: 2+7+9, 1+8, 4+5 and 3,6,10 in separate classes.
 
Thanks for the reply, but I don't think 1 can't be iso to 8 because they have different orders. Also I toyed with including 7 with 2,9, but I didn't in the end, I think you're probably right though, for some reason I thought <{1}> has order 3, damn it...
 
Oh, I'm sorry, the fourth roots of unity are {1,-1,i,-i}. This is indeed cyclic of order 4. Thus not isomorphic to any other group...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
10K