Payload dimension comparison between launch vehicles?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the maximum dimensions of payloads that various launch vehicles can carry, specifically mentioning Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, and the Space Shuttle. Participants note that while a comparative table is not readily available, individual company websites provide detailed specifications. For instance, SpaceX's site includes diagrams of payload fairings with maximum sizes and weights. Additionally, the Space Shuttle's dimensions are referenced, with its bay accommodating 60 x 15 feet and a maximum weight of 55,250 pounds. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of checking official sources for accurate payload information.
Shraa
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

Does anyone have a list of the maximum dimensions of objects that can be carried in various launch vehicles, eg Falcon 9/Falcon Heavy, space shuttle etc? It would be much appreciated!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Shraa--
I haven't seen a comparative table or anything, although it is most likely out there. Each of the company's websites likely list the data. For example, www.spacex.com has a diagram of the payload fairing with max. sizes and weights near the bottom of every page associated with a particular model. Click on the menu on the left of the home page. and the Shuttle dimensions/weights are on Wikipedia--bay accommodation is 60 x 15 feet and max. weight is 55,250 pounds. Hope that helps a bit.
 
Ah, that's a very useful place to start, thanks very much!
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top