PERE'S LAW, ELECTRIC FIELDS, AND RESISTANCE CALCULATIONS IN A MULTI-SECTION ROD

  • Thread starter Thread starter tigert2004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Resistance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric fields and resistance in a multi-section resistive rod with varying radii. The rod, measuring 9 mm in length, consists of three sections with electric field strengths of 2.5e3 V/m, 4e3 V/m, and 1.5e3 V/m. Participants emphasize the importance of determining the total voltage and voltage drops across each section to find the proportional resistance. The relationship between resistance, resistivity, length, and cross-sectional area is highlighted as crucial for calculating the radii of the first two sections based on the known radius of section three. The conversation ultimately focuses on resolving the dimensions of the rod's sections using these principles.
tigert2004
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Figure 26-24a gives the magnitude E(x) of the electric fields that have been set up by a battery along a resistive rod of length 9.00 mm . The rod consists of three sections of the same material and length but with different radii. The radius of section 3 is 5.00 mm.
E for section 1 is 2.5e3V/m, E for section 2 is 4e3V/m,
E for section 3 is 1.5e3V/m

I understand that p is the same for all of them put I am getting stuck after that
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tigert2004 said:
Figure 26-24a gives the magnitude E(x) of the electric fields that have been set up by a battery along a resistive rod of length 9.00 mm . The rod consists of three sections of the same material and length but with different radii. The radius of section 3 is 5.00 mm.
E for section 1 is 2.5e3V/m, E for section 2 is 4e3V/m,
E for section 3 is 1.5e3V/m

I understand that p is the same for all of them put I am getting stuck after that
What is the question?

Check the length. 9 mm can't be right if it is a rod. It must be 9 m.

You can find the applied voltage and voltage drops across each section easily enough from the electric field and lengths. You also can determine the resistance of each section in proportion to the resistance of the other sections or the total resistance.

All we need to know is the question.

AM
 
I am sorry, The question is what is the radius of the first and second section. The length is 9 mm. I can find V by equaling it to LE.
 
tigert2004 said:
I am sorry, The question is what is the radius of the first and second section. The length is 9 mm. I can find V by equaling it to LE.
Well the length doesn't really matter but if it is 9 mm, it is wider than it is long, hardly a rod.

Find the total applied voltage and voltage drops across each section.

With that, you can find the proportional resistance of each section. How is resistance related to resistivity, length and area? Use that information to find the relative areas of each section and use the area of section 3 to find the areas and radii of the other two.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top