What Is the Recoil Speed of Earth After a Meteorite Collision?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the recoil speed of Earth after a head-on collision with a 1680 kg meteorite traveling at 184 m/s. The relevant equation for a perfectly inelastic collision is applied, where the meteorite embeds itself in the Earth, which has a mass of 5.98 × 10^24 kg. Initial calculations yielded incorrect results, prompting the user to consider kinetic energy and the nature of the collision. After adjusting for significant figures, the final recoil speed was determined to be approximately 5.17 × 10^-20 m/s. The conversation highlights the complexities of collision physics and the importance of precision in calculations.
Idividebyzero
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
1.Use 5.98 × 1024 kg as the mass of the Earth.
A 1680 kg meteorite has a speed of 184 m/s
just before colliding head-on with the Earth.
Determine the recoil speed of the Earth.
Answer in units of m/s.




2. (m1+m2)vf=m1v1i+m2v2i



3. used the equation for a perfectly inelastic collision in which the meteor strikes and embeds itself in the Earth causing the Earth to recoil. the Earth being more massive this recoil velocity would be insignificanly small relative to persons on Earth anyways, solved for vf by m1v1i+m2v2i/(m1+m2) taking the Earth to be at rest initially. getting 5.2e-20 which is incorrect. i suppose I am supposed to take kinetic energy into the equations but i don't see how
 
Physics news on Phys.org
also tried

V'b= Va(2Ma/Ma+Mb) + Vb(Mb-Ma/Ma+Mb)
V'b=184(2*1680)/(1680 + 5.98e24) + 0
getting V'b=1.03e-19

i don't know maybe i need to take the Earth's rotation into account

nevermind this fails as its for elastic collisions only
 
also figured being a recoil the sign would be opposite, solved using elastic collision i get the same answer. 1.03e-19 but positive and negative incorrect
 
bump i need help
 
The question is that the speed of the satellite is given with respect to the Earth or with respect to the Sun. If it is with respect to the Earth then your method in the first post is correct, but give the result with one more significant digits.

ehild
 
i added more sig figs like you suggested and it was correct. 5.17e-20
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top