Period of a pendulum with two masses.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the period of a pendulum with two masses, where one mass is at the end and another is positioned closer to the pivot. The user attempts to simplify the problem using the center of mass but questions the validity of their approach when determining the impact of the distance x on the period T. It is noted that the two masses cannot be treated as a single mass due to the differing moments of inertia. Suggestions include reviewing the concept of physical pendulums and considering potential and kinetic energy to derive the equations of motion. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of the system and the need for a deeper understanding of inertia in pendulum dynamics.
1bigman
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have a light rigid pendulum with length ##l##. A mass ##M## is placed at the end and a mass ##m## is placed a distance ##x## from the pivot. What is the period of the pendulum?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Reduce the problem to a single mass situation using the center of mass. From the pivot, I get the center of mass ##r = \frac{mx+Ml}{m+M}##

Using the small angle approximation we end up with ##\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2} + \frac{g(M+m)}{mx + Ml} \theta = 0## and hence ## T = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{mx + Ml}{g(M+m)}}##

I suspect this is incorrect as the second part of the questions asks for the value of ##x## which has the greatest impact on ##T## which cannot be obtained as ##\frac{dT}{dx} = 0 ## has no solutions in ##0<x<l##. Help is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Problems like this are usually given after a discussion of the "physical pendulum" as opposed to the "simple pendulum". So, you might check your notes or text to see if a general formula for the period of a physical pendulum is given. Or see http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pendp.html
 
The 2 masses cannot be reduced to a single mass at the centre of mass. This is because the inertia of the system is dependant of the moment of inertia of the 2 masses (Which is different to that of 1 mass at the centre of mass).

If you haven't seen this before, take a look at this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pendp.html

If you are yet to visit moment of inertia, consider the potential and kinetic energy of the system (V+T)=E. By differentiating with respect to time and setting dE/dt to 0, the equation of motion can be obtained.
 
Ah yes of course! Many thanks for the help guys!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top