Permittivity of free space in physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between two values related to the permittivity of free space: 8.854x10^-12 c^2 N^-1 m^-2, which represents the permittivity of free space (ε0), and 8.988x10^9 N m^2 C^-2, which is Coulomb's constant (k). The relationship between these two constants is expressed as k = 1/(4πε0). The permittivity of free space is commonly used in Gauss' Law, while Coulomb's constant is used in Coulomb's law. Understanding when to use each value is essential for solving problems in electrostatics.
jimmy42
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hi,

In my physics book I have two values for the permittivity of free space:

8.854x10^-12 c^2 N^-1 m^-2

and

8.988x10^9 N m^2 C^-2

What is the difference between these two? When would I use one or the other?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jimmy42 said:
Hi,

In my physics book I have two values for the permittivity of free space:

8.854x10^-12 c^2 N^-1 m^-2

and

8.988x10^9 N m^2 C^-2

What is the difference between these two? When would I use one or the other?

Thanks.

One is the permittivity of free space, εo, typically seen in Gauss' Law, while the other is 1/(4πεo), typically seen as the proportionality constant used in Coulomb's law.
 
jimmy42 said:
In my physics book I have two values for the permittivity of free space:

8.854x10^-12 c^2 N^-1 m^-2
That's the permittivity of free space, usually symbolized as ε0.

and

8.988x10^9 N m^2 C^-2
That's Coulomb's constant, usually symbolized as k. (Not the permittivity of free space!)

What is the difference between these two? When would I use one or the other?
They are related by: k = 1/4πε0.

So you can write Coulomb's law as:
F = kq1q2/r2 = 1/4πε0 (q1q2/r2)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top