Permutations of prime ministers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the arrangements of seven prime ministers (A, B, C, D, E, F, G) for a summer meeting under specific conditions. For part a1, the requirement is that A must speak before C, leading to a total of 2520 arrangements. In part a2, the conditions expand to A speaking before C and C before E, resulting in 840 arrangements. Part b focuses on the scenario where C speaks immediately after A, yielding 360 arrangements. Participants also inquire about quicker methods for solving these permutations, suggesting factorial calculations as potential shortcuts.
fork
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
The prime ministers A, B, C, D, E, F and G of 7 countries will address at a summer meeting.
a) Find the number of arrangerments that can be made so that
1)A will speak before C,
2)A will speak before C and C will speak before E.
b)In how many of those ways in a2) will C speak immediately after A?

I stump in this question. :confused:

Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a.1) A: 1st~6th position, C takes a 2th~7th one, count the two numbers, then just do a multiplication on both (A gets the first one, C runs from 2~7, A get the second one, C runs from 3 to 7...etc )
a.2) A: 1st~5th, C is in 2~6, E is in 3~7, then do the same as a.1's(...)
b)Because there are only 7 groups, counting is a natural, easy way to reasoning a solution, this b question still can be done in the same fashion.
 
The answer from a1 to b are 2520, 840 and 360 respectively.

I don't know how to obtain the result from the above counting.

Thanks for your answering.

Also, are there any quicker methods of doing this question?
 
1) 7 ! / 2 !

2) 7 ! / 3!

3 ) 6 ! / 2 !
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top