Person pulling themselves up a double pulley

  • Thread starter Thread starter SadDan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley
AI Thread Summary
A man is pulling himself up using a double pulley system, exerting a force of 447.2 N on the larger disk while attached to the smaller disk at his waist. The discussion revolves around determining the acceleration at the man's center of mass, with the total moment of inertia of the pulley being 2.74 kg⋅m². Participants clarify the equations of motion and the relationship between tension forces and acceleration, noting potential sign errors in calculations. After some algebraic adjustments, the correct acceleration is found to be approximately 5.3 m/s². The conversation concludes with a light-hearted remark about the man's potential rotation during the pull-up.
SadDan
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A man is pulling himself up to a pulley that consists of two disks welded together as shown(same center). The man is currently pulling straight down on the rope in his hands with a force of magnitude 447.2 N (on the bigger disk). The other rope is also vertical and is attached to the man's waist at his center of mass(this is on the smaller disk). The man's mass is 76.3 kg, the pulley's total moment of inertia is 2.74 kg⋅m2, the radius of the small disk is 0.33 m, and the radius of the big disk is 0.62 m.

The man is hanging on a rope attached to the inner disk and is pulling on the rope attached to the outer disk. if you need a better description of the picture let me know.

Homework Equations


a(t) = angular acceleration*R
n2l for rotation and translation

The Attempt at a Solution


R=outer radii r=inner radii
sys: man Tpm+Tpm2-Mg=Ma
a=(Tpm+Tpm2-mg)/M
sys: pulley Tmp*R - Tmp2*r=angular acceleration*I
Tmp*R - Tmp2*r= a*I/r
(r*Tmp*R - Tmp2*r*r)/I= a
so far i have 2 equations and 3 unknowns, how would i solve for a from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you list the three unknowns? I see only 2.
 
the 2 different tension forces and the acceleration
 
Aren't you essentially given one of the tension forces?
 
  • Like
Likes SadDan
yes, yes i am. Thank you I didn't really make that connection
 
The statement of the problem does not really state what you are supposed to find.
Is the following picture representative of the setup?
upload_2017-3-19_22-2-52.png
 
  • Like
Likes SadDan
sorry i guess i forgot to include that, i am supposed to find the magnitude of acceleration at the mans waist or CM. And yes that picture is the right setup
 
SadDan said:
sorry i guess i forgot to include that, i am supposed to find the magnitude of acceleration at the mans waist or CM. And yes that picture is the right setup
OK. I think you have set up the equations correctly.
 
  • Like
Likes SadDan
Hold on. Check your signs in your equations to make sure your positive direction for ##a## corresponds to your positive direction for ##\alpha##.
[EDIT: Never mind, I think everything is OK!]
 
  • #10
So i solved for a=(F*R*r+F-M*g)/(M*r^2+I) and got the wrong answer which is probably a sign problem. If I made a positive clockwise torque and defined positive y to be up would the second tension force be negative in the first equation?
 
  • #11
SadDan said:
So i solved for a=(F*R*r+F-M*g)/(M*r^2+I) and got the wrong answer which is probably a sign problem. If I made a positive clockwise torque and defined positive y to be up would the second tension force be negative in the first equation?
No, both tensions act upward on the person. So, I think you are OK there.

What did you get for the ##a##?
 
  • #12
-18.99 m/s^2
 
  • #13
That's now what I get. I get about 5.3 m/s2.
 
  • #14
SadDan said:
So i solved for a=(F*R*r+F-M*g)/(M*r^2+I) a
You can see something's wrong with this equation. The terms in the parentheses do not have the same dimensions.
 
  • Like
Likes SadDan
  • #15
5.3m/s^2 worked but how did you get that? Did you just solve for Tmp in terms of a and plug that into the other equation?
 
  • #16
I plugged your two equations (from your first post) into Mathematica and let it do the grunt work!
 
  • #17
ok i tried again and got the right answer, just an algebra mistake. Thank you so much
 
  • #18
OK, good work. Did you notice that this person is going to go head-over-heels heels-over-head?
 
  • Like
Likes SadDan
  • #19
haha yes
 
  • #20
On second thought, I think it is head-over-heels. (Counterclockwise rotation of the person's body). Oh well.
 
Back
Top