PH<pKa means acidic form, but why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shrew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Means
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between pH, pKa, and the forms of acids and bases. It clarifies that when pH is less than pKa, the compound exists in its acidic form, and when pH is greater than pKa, it exists in its basic form. The participant questions this logic using ammonia (NH3) and its conjugate base (NH2-), noting that both are considered bases despite the rules suggesting they would be in their acidic forms in various pH environments. The conversation highlights that strong bases, like NH2-, effectively remove protons from other substances, converting to their conjugate acids (e.g., NH3) in reactions. However, these conjugate acids are typically weak and do not readily donate protons. The participant expresses satisfaction with this clarification, indicating a better understanding of the concepts discussed.
shrew
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I've memorized the following:
pH<pka, then acidic form
pH>pka, then basic form
And I'm guessing that pH=pka means neutral.

However, my instincts tell me it would be the opposite. Take NH3, ammonia, with a pKa of around 40. And then there's NH2-, which from a google search, has an incredibly high pKa. These are both basic.

So what the above rules state, is that if you added an amount of one of the above bases into a solution with pH=0, pH=7, or pH=14... in all cases the above bases would be in their acid forms?

So they're bases yet they're going to be in their acidic forms... if practically every solvent you add them to will turn them into acids, how can they be thought of as bases?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Compounds that are strong bases are considered strong bases because they will remove protons from other substances. For example, consider the reaction of the base NH2- with a compound like methanol:

NH2- + CH3OH --> NH3 + CH3O-

In reacting with methanol the base NH2- is converted to its conjugate acid NH3. Therefore, a base being converted to its conjugate acid means that the base has done its job: it has removed a proton from another substance and it will comfortably hold on to that proton and not let go of it. Hence, most strong bases will almost always exist as their conjugate acids once you mix that base with any other substance. Similarly, most strong acids will almost always exist as their conjugate bases once you mix the acid with any other substance.

Note that even though the conjugate acid of a strong base may be referred to as an acid, it will not be a very strong acid. These conjugate acids will be very unlikely to donate their protons to other substances. For example, NH3 is a very weak acid and it takes a lot to remove the proton from NH3 to reform NH2-.
 
Thanks, this was the type of confirmation I needed. :) I understand now, and this may be closed.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top