Phase Difference at Air-Glass Interface: 30°, λo=1μm

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the phase difference between points A and B at an air-glass interface with an incident angle of 30° and a wavelength of 1μm. Participants emphasize the need to consider the wavelength in both air and glass, as refraction alters the wavelength. The phase change is linked to the path length traversed by the wave, with a full wavelength corresponding to a 2π phase change. A key point raised is the importance of understanding how refraction affects the wave's angle and wavelength in the glass medium. Overall, the conversation highlights the necessity of applying the correct formulas to determine the phase difference accurately.
nmsurobert
Messages
288
Reaction score
36

Homework Statement


A plane-wave is incident on an air-glass interface at 30° as shown below. Calculate the phase difference between A and B. Assume λo=1μm.

attatched is an image that looks like this.
________________________

--------------------------- A

--------------------------- B

________________________

the angle is incident from above at 30°. the distance between A and B is 1μm.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


i really just need a bit of guidance. I feel as if i should have a formula for this but i don't. the book and my class notes aren't being much help either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nmsurobert said:
A plane-wave is incident on an air-glass interface at 30° as shown below. Calculate the phase difference between A and B. Assume λo=1μm.

what is the wavelength given -in air or glass-
if it is in air -one can calculate the wavelength in glass after refraction at 30 degree incidence and move ahead calculating the phase changes as it travels in glass.
where lies the actual hurdle?
 
How do I calculate the phase change? Like I said, I feel like I'm missing a formula.
 
nmsurobert said:
How do I calculate the phase change? Like I said, I feel like I'm missing a formula.

Phase and path traversed is related by simple concept-
When a wave travels full wavelength the it returns to identical phase- so a translation of lambda leads to phase change of 2.Pi
therefore phase difference = (2.Pi/ Wavelength). path length
 
drvrm said:
Phase and path traversed is related by simple concept-
When a wave travels full wavelength the it returns to identical phase- so a translation of lambda leads to phase change of 2.Pi
therefore phase difference = (2.Pi/ Wavelength). path length
If that's the case then wouldn't the phase difference be 2pi since the wave length and path length are the same?
 
nmsurobert said:
If that's the case then wouldn't the phase difference be 2pi since the wave length and path length are the same?
well one must consider the refraction and due to refraction the wave is inclined at certain angle -moreover the waves traverse the glass medium with changed wavelength which is related to refractive index of the medium -pick up a textbook on refraction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top