Phase Difference in Part II of Homework | Why is it Not pi/2?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a homework question regarding the phase difference in a graph, specifically why it is not equal to π/2. Participants clarify that the arrows in the second graph are one complete cycle apart, translating to a phase difference of 2π, not π/2. There is confusion regarding the direction of the arrows in the diagrams, but the main focus remains on understanding the correct phase difference. The initial poster acknowledges their misunderstanding after receiving clarification. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting phase differences in wave functions.
kelvin macks
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



for part ii , why the phase difference isn't =pi/2 ? I'm having problem uploading the photo .https://www.flickr.com/photos/123101228@N03/14289633415/

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the second graph under ii, you appear to have pencilled in two arrows exactly one complete cycle apart. How far is that in terms of radians?
 
i am not sure the penciled arrows is correct or not? on the top diagram in ii, both arrow at 0 and pi pointed downwards, whereas the below diagram pionted upwards. i did this beacuse i refer to the notes on other old book , but i don't know the reason why should i do this. can you expalin why?
 
...deleted
 
Last edited:
kelvin macks said:
i am not sure the penciled arrows is correct or not? on the top diagram in ii, both arrow at 0 and pi pointed downwards, whereas the below diagram pionted upwards. i did this beacuse i refer to the notes on other old book , but i don't know the reason why should i do this. can you expalin why?
I wasn't asking why the arrows are there, that doesn't matter. I'm just asking how far apart you think they are as a number of radians, i.e. their phase difference. From your reply, you seem to think they're π apart. They're one complete cycle apart, which is 2π.
 
sorry , i should nt have asked this question. i realized my mistake.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top