Well, this is probably a stupid question, but I don't see why (yet).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Let X_{i}be random variables identically distributed, with mean 0, such that the cumulative distribution is = 0 for all -1 < x < 1. So, I believe it is clear that for all n, the cumulative distribution of Z = (X_{1}+ X_{2}... X_{n})/n is = 0 for all x < -1. But the central limit theorem implies that this distribution (normalized by the square root of n), converges in distribution to the Normal distribution. So, for some n sufficiently large, the cumulative distribution of Z must be > 0 for some x < -1. Where is the fallacy in this paradox?

thx.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Philosophical question about central limit theorem

Tags:

Loading...

Similar Threads - Philosophical question central | Date |
---|---|

I Question about simplifying Sigma notation | Feb 11, 2018 |

I Shopping List Game: Probability Question | Dec 10, 2017 |

I A simple question about probability theory | Aug 2, 2017 |

Looking to discuss the philosophical foundations of mathematic | Oct 2, 2013 |

Probability philosophical paradox? | Dec 29, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**