Photo electric effect relate to determining the charge of an electron?

AI Thread Summary
The photoelectric effect involves photons knocking electrons out of a material, but it does not directly relate to determining the charge of an electron. The formula for the photoelectric effect can be used to calculate the maximum kinetic energy of ejected electrons, which indirectly involves the charge when applying a cutoff voltage. The classic method for determining the electron's charge is the Millikan Oil Drop Experiment, although there are claims of manipulation in Millikan's data. This raises questions about the reliability of his findings. Overall, while the photoelectric effect and charge determination are linked through energy calculations, they are fundamentally different concepts.
Kristine
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
how does the photo electric effect relate to determining the charge of an electron?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure that it does.

The photoelectric effect is where incident photons have sufficient energy to knock electrons out of their captured state - ie ionise the material. Charge is irrelevant here.
 
If we apply formula for Photoelectric effect i.e.

k_{max}=E_{photon}-\phi(work function of metal)

now if we are able to stop the fastest moving electron with cuttoff voltage such that eV_0 = K_{max}
so we can calculate e from above equation

But I'm not sure whether this is applied for charge calculation
 
Last edited:
The classic experiment for determination of electron charge is the Milliken Oil Drop Experiment. Or, as I call it, the Milliken Eye-strain Experiment.

Njorl
 
Yes its true classical method was developed by Milikan

But i read somewhere that he manipulated with his readings , is there any controversy
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top